Chinese Journal of Medical Education ›› 2026, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4): 310-314.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20250421-00446

• Medical Education Assessment • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Construction of general practice military doctors′ competency evaluation indicator system

Dong Zhao1, Shi Mingyue1, Shi Kang2, Dong Xiaojian3, Liu Weiming4, Yang Jiaxiao5, Ge Wei1   

  1. 1Department of General Practice, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
    2Academic Affairs Office, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
    3Department of Preventive Medicine, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
    4Department of Medical Service, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi′an 710032, China;
    5General Clinic, Unit 95577 of the Chinese People′s Liberation Army, Qujing 655600, China
  • Received:2025-04-21 Online:2026-04-01 Published:2026-03-27
  • Contact: Ge Wei, Email: geweidr@fmmu.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
    The National Education Sciences Planning Project for Defense and Military Education (JYKY-D 2023033); The Shaanxi Provincial Higher Education Teaching Reform Research Project (19JY026); The National Natural Science Foundation of China (82270259)

Abstract: Objective To construct general practice military doctors′ competency evaluation indicator system, clarify the training objectives for grass-roots general practice military doctors under the new situation and facilitate accurate evaluation of their competencies. Methods The evaluation index framework was initially established by literature review, expert consultation and group discussion. The Delphi method was used to determine the index system by two rounds of correspondence to 18 experts. Then combined with Analytic Hierarchy Process to form the judgment matrix, calculate the weight values of the importance of indicators at all levels, and form the evaluation indicators system. Results The recovery rates of questionnaires in both rounds of consultation were 100.0%. The expert authority coefficient was 0.875, and the coordination coefficient of expert opinions in the second round reached 0.400 (P<0.05), leading to the establishment of an evaluation indicator system of general practice military doctors′ competency. This system comprises 6 first-level indicators and 27 second-level indicators. The weight ranking of first-level indicators is as follows: occupational qualities (0.363), knowledge ability (0.260), rescue ability (0.175), military and political literacy (0.076), communication expansion (0.076), and lifelong development (0.050). Conclusions The evaluation indicator system determined by the Delphi method and Analytic Hierarchy Process is scientifically reliable. It clarifies the training objectives of the ″six core competencies″ of general practice military doctors. It is of great significance for establishing and improving the training, education, and evaluation system of general medical doctors guided by job competencies in the military, ensuring the sustainable and high-quality growth of grass-roots military doctors, and promoting the high-quality development of grass-roots health care in the military.

Key words: General practice, General practice military doctors, Competency, Delphi method, Indicator system

CLC Number: