医学教育评估

临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评价量表的汉化和信效度分析

  • 李玥 ,
  • 张丁丁 ,
  • 佟元任 ,
  • 魏怡真 ,
  • 朱惠娟 ,
  • 刘继海 ,
  • 罗林枝 ,
  • 张抒扬
展开
  • 1中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院消化科 100730;
    2中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院医学科学研究中心 100730;
    3北京协和医学院2014级八年制临床医学专业 100730;
    4中国医学科学院 北京协和医院教育处 100730;
    5中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院内分泌科 100730;
    6中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院心内科 100730

收稿日期: 2020-06-23

  网络出版日期: 2021-04-29

基金资助

北京协和医学院教育教学改革项目(2020zlgc0110)

Reliability and validity of the mandarin version of mentor competency assessment

  • Li Yue ,
  • Zhang Dingding ,
  • Tong Yuanren ,
  • Wei Yizhen ,
  • Zhu Huijuan ,
  • Liu Jihai ,
  • Luo Linzhi ,
  • Zhang Shuyang
Expand
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;
    2Department of Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;
    3Eight-year Program of Clinical Medicine, Enrolled in 2014, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;
    4Department of Education, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;
    5Department of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;
    6Department of Cardiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China

Received date: 2020-06-23

  Online published: 2021-04-29

Supported by

Education Reform Projects of Peking Union Medical College (2020zlgc0110)

摘要

目的 引进、汉化临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评估量表(mentor competency assessment,MCA),并对其进行信效度检验。方法 2020年1月至3月,采用Brislin 翻译模型进行翻译、回译,并通过专家函询和预调查对翻译初稿进行文化调适。选取北京协和医院153名临床医学博士后导师、副导师为调查对象,采用一般资料调查表和中文版MCA进行调查。对中文版MCA进行信度和效度分析。结果 中文版MCA包括保持有效沟通、建立一致的预期和目标、评估学生、培养独立性、尊重多样性、促进学生的职业发展6个维度,26个条目。量表克朗巴赫系数为0.975,Spearman-Brown折半系数为0.951;量表各条目评分与总分呈正相关(r 值为0.634~0.823)。量表的条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)为0.6~1.0,量表水平的内容效度指数(S-CVI)为0.954。验证性因子分析结果显示,χ2 自由度比(χ2 /DF)为1.865,比较拟合优质指数(CFI)为0.925,非标准拟合指数(TLI)为0.914,标准化残差均方和平方根(SRMR)为0.043,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0.085(95%CI:0.073~0.096,P<0.01)。结论 中文版MCA具有良好信度和效度,适用于我国临床和转化医学研究导师的胜任力评价。

本文引用格式

李玥 , 张丁丁 , 佟元任 , 魏怡真 , 朱惠娟 , 刘继海 , 罗林枝 , 张抒扬 . 临床和转化医学研究导师胜任力评价量表的汉化和信效度分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021 , 41(5) : 472 -476 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200623-00951

Abstract

Objective To translate the mentor competency assessment (MCA) into Mandarin, and test its reliability and validity. Methods Brislin translation model was used for translation and reverse-translation. The preliminary translation was culturally adjusted through expert committee discussions followed by a pre-tests. Mentors of clinical post-doctoral trainees at Peking Union Medical College Hospital (PUMCH) were enrolled as the survey subjects (n=153) from January 2020 to March 2020. General questionnaire and Mandarin version of MCA were used. Item analysis, reliability, and validity analysis of the Mandarin version of MCA were tested. Results The Mandarin version of MCA includes 26 items in six dimensions, including effective communication, establishing consistent expectations and goals, evaluating students, fostering independence, respecting diversity, and promoting students' professional development. Reliability analysis showed that Cronbach's coefficient score was 0.975, and split-half coefficient score was 0.951. Each item was positively correlated with the total score (r=0.634~0.823). The item content validity index (I-CVI) is 0.6~1.0, and the scale content validity index (S-CVI) was 0.954. The confirmatory factor analysis results showed that the ratio of χ2 degrees of freedom (χ2 /DF) was 1.865, the comparative fit index was 0.925, the Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) =0.914, and the standardized root mean square residual(SRMR)=0.043, and the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.085 (95%CI,0.073~0.096,P<0.01). Conclusions The reliability and validity of the Mandarin version of MCA was evaluated and the Mandarin version of MCA is competent to the evaluation of the mentor competency of clinical and translational research mentors in China.

参考文献

[1] 李玥, 魏怡真, 张丁丁, 等. 导师培训项目提升临床和转化医学导师的自信心和技能[J].基础医学与临床,2020,40(6):856-862.
[2]Pfund C, House SC, Asquith P, et al. Training mentors of clinical and translational research scholars: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Acad Med, 2014,89(5):774-782. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.000000
0000000218.
[3] Feldman MD, Arean PA, Marshall SJ, et al. Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university[J]. Med Educ Online, 2010,23:15.DOI: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5063.
[4] Fleming M, House S, Hanson VS, et al. The mentoring competency assessment: validation of a new instrument to evaluate skills of research mentors[J]. Acad Med, 2013,88(7):1002-1008. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318295e298.
[5] Michael R Phillips, 赵靖平. 西方量表译本的评价和修订[J].国外医学·精神病学分册,1987(3):135-144.
[6] 苏立, 姚秋会, 徐晓阳, 等. 医学研究生导师胜任力评价指标体系的构建[J].保健医学研究与实践,2015,12(2):81-85.
[7] 林卓清, 王兆品, 沈郁, 等. 基于岗位胜任力的临床医学研究生导师评价体系构建及其应用[J].中国高等医学教育,2019(7):125-126. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2019.07.064.
[8] Weber-Main AM, Shanedling J, Kaizer AM, et al. A randomized controlled pilot study of the University of Minnesota mentoring excellence training academy: a hybrid learning approach to research mentor training[J]. J Clin Transl Sci, 2019,3(4):152-164. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2019.368.
文章导航

/