住院医师规范化培训

360度评估在以胜任力为导向的儿科住院医师规范化培训中的应用

  • 刘黎黎 ,
  • 钟以琳 ,
  • 于果 ,
  • 侯新琳 ,
  • 齐建光
展开
  • 北京大学第一医院儿科 100031

收稿日期: 2020-09-16

  网络出版日期: 2021-03-04

基金资助

中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2018年医学教育研究立项课题(2018B-N01008);北京大学医学部专科医师规范化培训研究课题重点基金资助项目(2019ZP04)

Application of 360-degree assessment in the competency-oriented standardized training of pediatric residents

  • Liu Lili ,
  • Zhong Yilin ,
  • Yu Guo ,
  • Hou Xinlin ,
  • Qi Jianguang
Expand
  • Pediatric Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100031, China

Received date: 2020-09-16

  Online published: 2021-03-04

Supported by

2018 Medical Education Research Project of Medical Education Branch of Chinese Medical Association and Medical Education Professional Committee of Chinese Higher Education Association (2018B-N01008); Key Fund Supported Project of Standardized Training of Specialized Doctors of Peking University Health Science Center(2019ZP04)

摘要

目的 探讨360度评估在以胜任力为导向的儿科住院医师规范化培训(下文简称住培)中的应用效果。方法 2020年6月至9月,收集2017年至2019年在北京大学第一医院儿科完成住培的48名住院医师的2688份360度评估结果并进行分析。结果 ①不同评估者对住院医师评分不同:患儿家长评分最高,为(4.9±0.3)分,其次为同级医师(4.7±0.3)分和护士(4.6±0.5)分,上级医师评分最低,为(4.5±0.4)分;②住院医师在不同胜任力方面评分不同:医学专家、交流者、合作者、领导者、健康倡导者、学者及职业人评分分别为(4.4±0.4)分、(4.6±0.5)分、(4.7±0.4)分、(4.5±0.3)分、(4.6±0.4)分、(4.4±0.5)分、(4.8±0.4)分,医学专家和学者角色评分最低,职业人角色评分最高;③护士、同级医师和上级医师对第二年住院医师的评分均高于第一年住院医师,差异均具有统计学意义[(4.8±0.4)分比(4.5±0.6)分、(4.8±0.1)分比(4.6±0.3)分、(4.6±0.3)分比(4.4±0.4)分,均P<0.01];第二年住院医师在医学专家、交流者、领导者、健康倡导者、学者及职业人的胜任力评分均高于第一年,差异均具有统计学意义[(4.5±0.5)分比(4.4±0.5)分、(4.7±0.4)分比(4.5±0.5)分、(4.6±0.4)分比(4.4±0.5)分、(4.7±0.4)分比(4.6±0.5)分、(4.5±0.4)分比(4.3±0.5)分、(4.9±0.3)分比(4.8±0.4)分,均P<0.05]。结论 在儿科住院医师规范化培训中,应用360度评估对住院医师进行持续、全面、多维度评价,有助于促进住院医师能力的提升。

本文引用格式

刘黎黎 , 钟以琳 , 于果 , 侯新琳 , 齐建光 . 360度评估在以胜任力为导向的儿科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021 , 41(3) : 251 -255 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20200916-01351

Abstract

Objective To explore the role of 360-degree assessment in the competency-oriented standardized training of pediatric residents. Methods A total of 2 688 360-degree evaluation results of 48 residents who completed standardized training in the Department of Pediatrics, Peking University First Hospital from 2017 to 2019 were collected and statistically analyzed respectively. Results (1)Different types of evaluators scored residents differently.The score from parents was the highest,(4.9±0.3),followed by (4.7±0.3) from peer residents and (4.6±0.5) from nurses.The score from superior physicians was the lowest, (4.5±0.4).(2)Residents had different scores in different competences. They scored (4.4±0.4),(4.6±0.5), (4.7±0.4),(4.5±0.3),(4.6±0.4),(4.4±0.5),(4.8±0.4) in the role of medical experts, communicators, collaborators, leaders, health advocates, scholars and professionalism, respectively. They had the lowest score in the roles of medical experts and scholars, and the highest score in professionalism.(3)The 360-degree assessment of the second year residents showed higher score from different evaluators and in various competencies than the first-year residents. Conclusions The 360-degree assessment can continuously and comprehensively evaluate the abilities of residents in a multi-dimensional way during the rotation process,and promote the overall improvement of residents.

参考文献

[1] 李海潮.实施胜任力导向的医学教育,提高住院医师规范化培训水平[J].中国医刊,2018,53(1):21-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2018.01.006.
[2] Oktay C, Senol Y, Rinnert S, et al. Utility of 360-degree assessment of residents in a Turkish academic emergency medicine residency program[J].Turk J Emerg Med,2017,17(1):12-15.DOI: 10.1016/j.tjem.2016.09.007.
[3] Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.CanMEDS: better standards, better physicians, better care[EB/OL].[2017-12-20].http://www.royalcollege.ca/rcsite/canmeds/canmedsframework-e.
[4] 闫辉, 齐建光, 张欣,等.形成性评价在儿科住院医师规范化培训中的实践与意义[J].中国高等医学教育,2017(2):37-38.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2017.02.019.
[5] 黄辞, 陈宇昆, 李玉骞, 等. 360度评估系统在住院医师规范化培训中的意义[J].医学教育研究与实践,2020,28(1):177-181.DOI: 10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2020.01.045.
[6] 姜燕, 王立峰, 乔羽, 等. 360度评估在住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2020,27(5):471-473.DOI: 10.16770/J.cnki.1008-9985.2020.05.021.
[7] 周智涓, 尚斌芳, 徐磊, 等. 360度评估系统在住院医师规范化培训信息化管理中的应用与探索[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2019,3(5):396-400.
[8] 陈雯, 沈寒蕾, 赖铭裕, 等. 360度评价在住培学员岗位胜任力评价中的应用[J].中国继续医学教育,2020,12(11):30-32.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2020.11.011.
[9] Yama BA, Hodgins M, Boydell K, et al. A qualitative exploration: questioning multisource feedback in residency education[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2018,18(1):170. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1270-7.
[10] Prediger S, Schick K, Fincke F, et al. Validation of a competence-based assessment of medical students'performance in the physician's role[J].BMC Med Educ,2020,20(1):6-10.DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1919-x.
[11] 李宁宁, 夏金堂, 徐学虎,等.外科住院医师职业道德和沟通能力的360度评价[J].中国继续医学教育,2018,10(32):3-5.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2018.32.002.
[12] 应振华, 张贝江, 王莹, 等. 我国住院医师规范化培训360度评估体系的探索与实践[J].中国高等医学教育,2019(6):27-28,106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2019.06.014.
[13] 胡显锋, 胡绍, 王岚, 等. 以360度评估为主的综合评估是保证住院医师规范化培训质量的关键[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2019,3(5):385-390.
文章导航

/