目的 评价内科护理学课程过渡型双语教学模式的应用效果。方法 从2017年开始连续3个学年的秋季学期,以大连大学护理学专业本科三年级139名学生为教学对象,设计三阶段过渡型双语教学模式和相应配套教学材料。采用病例翻译测试、问卷调查和访谈、医学教学环境评价量表评价教学效果。结果 双语教学前学生病例翻译测试评分为[45(30,60)]分,低于教学后的[70(50,90)]分,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。73.4%(102/139)的学生对本次双语教学持肯定态度,但也有部分学生在访谈中反映英文专业词汇较为复杂,对专业知识的学习和理解有一定影响。“学生对学习的感知”调查的大部分条目学生给予了正面的反馈,如教学针对性强[79.7%(102/128)]、教学考虑学生需求[81.3%(104/128)]等。 内科护理学课程过渡型双语教学模式的实施取得较好的效果,学生满意度较高,但在教学设计和实施细节上仍需继续改进。
Objective To evaluate the effect of transitional bilingual teaching mode for medical nursing.Methods The following three autumn semesters from 2017,139 nursing students in the third grade were selected as the project objects. A three-stage transitional bilingual teaching mode for medical nursing was designed; the professional English translation examination, questionnaire survey, informal communication, face-to-face interview, and Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) scale were used to evaluate the teaching effects.Results The score of the test for English case translation before bilingual teaching was [45 (30,60)], which was lower than [70 (50,90)] that after bilingual teaching (P<0.01). Totally 73.4% (102/139) of the students hold a positive attitude towards bilingual teaching. Still, some students also reflected that English professional vocabulary was more complex, which impacted the learning and understanding of professional knowledge. The results of “students' perception of learning” assessment showed that students gave positive feedback in most items, such as strong teaching pertinence [79.7% (102/128)], matching of teaching to students’ needs[81.3% (104/128)].Conclusions The transitional bilingual teaching mode is a suitable teaching method for medical nursing. But it still needs continuous optimization in curriculum designation for better implementation.
[1] 中华人民共和国教育部.关于加强高等学校本科教学工作提高教学质量的若干意见(教高[2001] 4号)[Z]. 2001-08-28.
[2] 王惠珍, 魏小雪. 我国国际适用型本科护理人才培养现状综述[J].中华护理教育,2014,11(5):391-395. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.1672-9234.2014.05.020.
[3] Garone A, Van de Craen P. The role of language skills and internationalization in nursing degree programmes: a literature review[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2017, 49:140-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.012.
[4] 曲燕,王振波,王建军.中国高校双语教学模式研究现状[J]. 高等理科教育,2014(2):104-108.
[5] 赵圆, 柳俊杰, 刘文亚. 基于过渡式双语教学在临床本科教育层次医学生影像教学的探索[J].影像研究与医学应用,2018,2(20):164-165. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2018.20.111.
[6] 齐丽. 过渡型《基础护理学》双语教学效果评价[J].中国实用医药,2011,6(18):250. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-7555.2011.18.200.
[7] 郝燕萍, 周英. 双语教学模式在本科护理专业课程中的实践及效果评价[J].中国高等医学教育,2019(7):98-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2019.07.050.
[8] CYW C, Sum MY, GMY T, et al. Adoption and correlates of the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) in the evaluation of undergraduate learning environments - a systematic review[J]. Med Teach, 2018, 40(12):1240-1247. DOI: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1426842.
[9] 孙宝志, 赵玉虹. 英国医学教育环境测量理论的引进与应用[J].医学教育探索,2003,2(4):13-16,19. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2003.04.005.
[10] 何松霖, 王金华. 医学教育环境评估量表在我国口腔医学生中应用的信度与效度分析[J].上海口腔医学,2020,29(1):109-112. DOI: 10.19439/j.sjos.2020.01.023.
[11] 张诗阳. 关于高校双语教学模式的思考[J].吕梁学院学报,2015,5(6):83-86. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-185X.2015.06.024.