本文分析了医学学科评估面临的挑战,通过调研和访谈相关专家,结合实证,以我国医学学科的发展现况和需求为基础,提出了包括设立分层、分类的评估指标,增设学科发展理念指标,设立围绕培养过程的人才培养指标,设立适应国家需求的科研与应用研究指标,设立医学人才可持续发展的师资队伍评估指标,以及设立社会贡献评估指标的医学学科评估指标体系构建的思考和建议。
To reverse unscientific value orientation , it is urgent to construct a scientific assessment system of medical disciplines. Through reviewing the assessment history and the development trend of medical disciplines, researching and interviewing relevant experts, and combining the empirical study, it is tried to put forward thoughts and suggestions for the construction of medical discipline assessment index system, which covers a stratified and classified assessment indexes on strategy building of discipline development, an in-process evaluation index for talent bring up, the evaluation indexes for scientific research and nationwide needs-based application, evaluation indexes for sustainable faculty development, and evaluation system of medical disciplines in terms of academic reputation as well as social contribution.
[1] 习近平:在全国教育大会上强调坚持中国特色社会主义教育发展道路培养德智体美劳全面发展的社会主义建设者和接班人[EB/OL].(2018-09-10)[2020-03-01]. http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018-09/10/c_1123408400.htm.
[2]张小玲,傅松滨.浅谈临床医学研究与基础医学研究之关系[J].山西医科大学学报(基础医学教育版),2004,6(1):47-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1450.2004.01.031.
[3]杨春喜,殷宁,戴尅戎.转化医学[J].中华医学杂志,2010,90(7) :499-502.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2010.07.019.
[4]刘懿萱,徐明,段丽萍, 等.学科评估导向下基础医学学科的发展[J].中华医学教育杂志,2016,36(6):807-809. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2016.06.002.
[5]李巍,马闯.英国卓越框架(REF)对我国高校科研绩效评价的借鉴作用[J].中国军转民,2019(2):76-78. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5874.2019.02.027.
[6]宗晓华,郝笑影.英国大学科研绩效评估与绩效拨款机制——基于科研卓越框架(REF)的分析[J].江苏高教,2019(6):112-118. DOI:10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2019.06.019.
[7]范英杰,徐芳.如何看待研究成果社会影响力评价?——英国高等教育机构科研水平评估框架概览[J].科学与社会,2019,9(1):129-142. DOI:10.19524/j.cnki.10-1009/g3.2019.01.129.