中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 >

2020 , Vol. 40 >Issue 3: 187 - 191

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.03.007

教学方法

基于“学习通”的翻转课堂在检体诊断学教学中的应用

  • 何非 ,
  • 盛建龙 ,
  • 许邦龙 ,
  • 王丽萍
展开
  • 1安徽医科大学第二附属医院心血管内科,合肥 230601;
    2广东医科大学护理学院护理学基础教研室,广东省东莞市 523808

收稿日期: 2019-04-27

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-10

基金资助

安徽省教育厅高等学校省级质量工程教学研究项目(2019jyxm1002);广东医科大学教育教学研究课题(1027/2JY16023)

收起

Application and effect of Xuexitong app based Flipped classroom in the course of physical diagnosis

  • He Fei ,
  • Sheng Jianlong ,
  • Xu Banglong ,
  • Wang Liping
Expand
  • 1Department of Cardiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China;
    2Department of Basic Nursing, School of Nursing, Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan 523808, China

Received date: 2019-04-27

  Online published: 2020-12-10

Supported by

Provincial Quality Engineering Teaching Research Project of Colleges and Universities, Education Department of Anhui Province(2019jyxm1002); Education and Teaching Research Project of Guangdong Medical University (1027/2JY16023)

Fold

摘要

目的 探讨基于“学习通”手机应用软件的翻转课堂在检体诊断学教学中的应用效果。方法 2018年9月至2019年1月,选择安徽医科大学第二临床医学院2016级临床医学专业120名本科生为研究对象,以随机数字表法将其分为试验组和对照组,每组60名学生。试验组采用基于“学习通”的翻转课堂教学,将教学资源上传至“学习通”供学生课前学习,课中分别采用知识点回顾、小组协作及总结的方法进行知识内化,课后通过“学习通”进行知识巩固。对照组采用传统教学方法。比较课前和课后2组学生的提问率、考试成绩、学业自我效能感和对各自教学的满意度。结果 试验组学生课前和课后提问率均高于对照组学生[73.3%(44/60)比26.7%(16/60),53.3%(32/60)比31.7%(19/60)],差异均具有统计学意义(P＜0.01、P=0.036)。试验组学生理论考核和体格检查评分均高于对照组学生[(76.0±9.9)分比(68.9±12.1)分,(76.3±9.1)分比(64.5±11.7)分],差异均具有统计学意义(均P＜0.01)。课程结束后,试验组学生学业自我效能感总分高于对照组学生[(79.3±8.5)分比(73.6±6.4)分],差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。试验组学生对教学满意度总体评价也高于对照组学生[(11.8±1.5)分比(9.1±1.9)分],差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.01)。结论 基于“学习通”的翻转课堂有助于提高学生的学业自我效能感和检体诊断学的教学效果。

关键词： 教学方法; 移动学习; 翻转课堂; 检体诊断学

本文引用格式

何非 , 盛建龙 , 许邦龙 , 王丽萍 . 基于“学习通”的翻转课堂在检体诊断学教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020 , 40(3) : 187 -191 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.03.007

Abstract

Objective To investigate the effect of Xuexitong app based flipped classroom in the course of physical diagnosis. Methods From September 2018 to January 2019, 120 students from the Second Clinical School of Anhui Medical University were divided into control and experimental group, receiving traditional teaching mode and Xuexitong app based Flipped classroom teaching mode, respectively. Academic self-efficacy, examination scores, and teaching satisfaction were compared between the groups. Results The rate of asking questions before and after class in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group [73.3%(44/60) vs 26.7%(16/60),53.3%(32/60) vs 31.7%(19/60), P＜0.01]. The test scores of students the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group[(76.0±9.9) vs (68.9±12.1), P＜0.01]. Similarly, examination skill scores of students the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group [(76.3±9.1) vs (64.5±11.7), P＜0.01]. After the course, academic self-efficacy in experimental group was significantly higher than control group [(79.3±8.5) vs (73.6±6.4), P＜0.01]. In addition, students in the study group acquired higher satisfaction with teaching compared with the control group [(11.8±1.5)vs(9.1±1.9), P＜0.01]. Conclusions Application of Xuexitong app based Flipped classroom in the course of physical diagnosis remarkably promoted the academic self-efficacy and teaching learning outcomes of trainees.

Key words： Teaching; Mobile learning; Flipped classroom; Physical diagnosis

参考文献

[1]邢文娟,张海锋. 基于翻转课堂的基础医学概论课程改革实践与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019, 39(4): 272-275. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.04.008.
[2]张丽君. 基于超星学习通的英语阅读移动教学模式应用研究[J]. 信息技术与信息化, 2016(12): 91-93,96. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9528.2016.12.023.
[3]刘震雄,赵曙光,窦维佳,等. 翻转课堂在物理诊断学教学中的应用初探[J]. 海南医学, 2016, 27(8): 1357-1360. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2016.08.054.
[4]谭超,董巧稚,孙海燕,等. 翻转课堂教学法在心脏体格检查教学中的应用[J]. 中国继续医学教育, 2017, 9(14): 11-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2017.14.006.
[5]梁宇颂. 大学生学业自我效能感与心理健康的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床康复, 2004, 8(24): 4962-4963. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-8225.2004.24.014.
[6]汤跃明,付晓丽,卜彩丽. 近十年移动学习研究现状评述[J]. 中国远程教育(综合版), 2016(7): 36-43. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-458X.2016.07.006.
[7]范文翔,马燕,李凯,等. 移动学习环境下微信支持的翻转课堂实践探究[J]. 开放教育研究, 2015,21(3): 90-97. DOI: 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2015.03.011.
[8]唐英. 基于超星学习通的翻转课堂实践研究[J]. 常州信息职业技术学院学报, 2018, 17(4): 33-36.
[9]肖静,徐苗苗,彭美娟,等. PBL教学法对医学生学业自我效能感的影响[J]. 卫生职业教育, 2018, 36(6): 60-61.
[10]刘芳,候金波. 大学生学业自我效能感对学习成绩的影响[J]. 长江大学学报(社会科学版), 2015,38(10): 77-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1395.2015.10.024.
[11]张金磊,王颖,张宝辉. 翻转课堂教学模式研究[J]. 远程教育杂志, 2012, 30(4): 46-51. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0008.2012.04.005.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉