医学教育评估

以疾病为中心的龋病学融合课程试卷分析

  • 刘杰 ,
  • 郑树国 ,
  • 王晓灵 ,
  • 罗海燕 ,
  • 夏斌 ,
  • 陈霄迟 ,
  • 司燕 ,
  • 王晓燕 ,
  • 董艳梅 ,
  • 高学军
展开
  • 100081 北京大学口腔医学院教育处(刘杰),口腔预防科(郑树国、司燕),中心实验室(王晓灵),口腔病理科(罗海燕),儿童口腔科(夏斌),口腔生物学教研室(陈霄迟),牙体牙髓科(王晓燕、董艳梅、高学军)

网络出版日期: 2020-12-09

Analysis of examination papers for disease centered integration courses of clinical cariology

  • Liu Jie ,
  • Zheng Shuguo ,
  • Wang Xiaoling ,
  • Luo Haiyan ,
  • Xia Bin ,
  • Chen Xiaochi ,
  • Si Yan ,
  • Wang Xiaoyan ,
  • Dong Yanmei ,
  • Gao Xuejun
Expand
  • Teaching Administration Office, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081,China (Liu J);
    Department of Preventive Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081,China(Zheng SG, Si Y);
    Central Laboratory, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081,China(Wang XL);
    Department of Oral Pathology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China(Luo HY);
    Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081,China(Xia B);
    Department of Oral Biology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081,China(Chen XC);
    Department of Cariology and Endodontology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100081,China (Wang XY,Dong YM, Gao XJ)

Online published: 2020-12-09

摘要

目的 了解龋病学融合课程临床龋病学考试命题现状,以提高试卷命题质量,促进教学质量的提高。方法 对北京大学口腔医学院3届八年制口腔医学专业学生的162份临床龋病学试卷进行了试卷结构和质量分析。结果 学生考试成绩良好;3届试卷结构不够稳定,试卷中主客观题比例相差较大;试卷难度和信度尚可,试卷区分度略低,其中简答题和论述题区分度最低。结论 3届学生临床龋病学考试结果基本可信。今后命题时需适度提高试卷的区分度,并在教学和试卷中体现“融合”特点,引导学生多学科思考。进一步探索试卷中融合题目的比例,改变命题和阅卷形式,建立题库,并提高综合应用题目所占比重。

本文引用格式

刘杰 , 郑树国 , 王晓灵 , 罗海燕 , 夏斌 , 陈霄迟 , 司燕 , 王晓燕 , 董艳梅 , 高学军 . 以疾病为中心的龋病学融合课程试卷分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2017 , 37(3) : 474 -480 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.03.035

Abstract

Objective By analysis of examination papers , theObjective was to summarize effects of “integration of multidiscipline course of cariology” on teaching and learning, for further improving the teaching quality.Methods Analysis of final test papers of clinical cariology for consecutive classes of eight-year program students major in stomatology of grade 2010-2012 in Peking University School of Stomatology.Results Students have good scores with a normal distribution. However, the structure consistence among the examination papers for consecutive classes was not well consistent, and proportion of the subjective item andObjective item were not well balanced .The item difficulty and reliability was well designed, but the item discrimination index was lower.Conclusions The result of examination paper of three consecutive years is basically reliable, but the discrimination index should be improved moderately, in order to reflect the “integration” characteristics, and guide the students to the multidisciplinary thinking. Therefore, it is necessary to further explore the proportion of the integration topic in the examination paper, change the form of proposition and paper marking, establish the question bank, and improve the proportion of comprehensive application topics.

参考文献

[1] 王嘉德,高学军,高岩,等.口腔医学专业龋病学课程融合的研究与实践[J],中华医学教育杂志,2006,26(3):36-38.
Wang JD,Gao XJ, Gao Y, et al. Disease-based learning: integration of multi-disciplines in teaching of cariology[J].Chin J Med Edu,2006,26(3):36-38.
[2] 李静,朱继民,武松,等.某高校护理专业学生预防医学试卷分析[J],中华疾病控制杂志,2014,18(3):265-267.
Li J,Zhu JM,Wu S,et al.Analysis of examination paper on preventive medicine of nursing specialty in university[J]. Chinese Journal of Disease Control & Prevention,2014,18(3):265-267.
[3] 黄颖,林端宜.试卷分析研究现状综述[J],西北医学教育,2005,13(1):39-40. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2769.2005.01.020.
[4] 陈熙,吴成秋,贺栋梁.试卷分析与评价的指标体系及其应用[J],西北医学教育,2006,14(5):542,589.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2769.2006.05.026.
[5] 卢燕, 王培玉, 刘宝花. 北京大学医学部八年制医学生预防医学期末考试试卷分析[J].中华医学教育杂志,2013,33(5):791-793. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2013.05.049.
Lu Y, Wang PY, Liu BH. Analysis on the final test papers of preventive medicine for eight-year program medical students from Peking University Health Science Center[J].Chin J Med Edu,2013,33(5):791-793. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2013.05.049.
[6] 罗汀. 基于难度和区分度的试卷分析[J],考试周刊,2011(57):2-4.
文章导航

/