研究生教育

“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系初探

  • 吴恒璟 ,
  • 李金慧 ,
  • 吴静 ,
  • 钱曙蕾 ,
  • 赵艾霞 ,
  • 陈琳
展开
  • 1同济大学医学院院办公室,上海 200092;
    2同济大学医学与生命科学部办公室,上海 200092;
    3上海中医药大学护理学院基础护理教研室 201203;
    4同济大学医学院研究生办公室,上海 200092

收稿日期: 2019-10-22

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

基金资助

2018年中国学位与研究生教育学会学位与研究生教育研究课题(B1-YX20180501-03);同济大学研究生教育研究与改革项目(2019PT04、2019GL09)

Study on the evaluation index system of medical postgraduate tutor in double first-class universities

  • Wu Hengjing ,
  • Li Jinhui ,
  • Wu Jing ,
  • Qian Shulei ,
  • Zhao Aixia ,
  • Chen Lin
Expand
  • 1Administrative Office, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    2Administrative Office, Department of Medicine and Life Science, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;
    3Fundamental Nursing Office, School of Nursing, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 201203, China;
    4GraduateAffairs Office, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received date: 2019-10-22

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Supported by

Academic Degrees and Graduate Education Research Project of Chinese Society of Academic Degrees and Graduate Education in 2018(B1-YX20180501-03); Tongji University Graduate Education Research and Reform Project(2019PT04, 2019GL09)

摘要

目的 构建“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系。方法 在调研、文献研究和政策分析的基础,采用问卷调查方法,通过2轮专家咨询问卷调查,采用描述性分析、非参数检验、权值因子判断表等方法进行数据分析。结果 2轮问卷总体权威系数为0.84;指标的Kendall's W协调系数为0.122,P=0.001,专家集中程度和协调性高度一致。初步建立了“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系,指标体系由3个一级指标、9个二级指标、31个三级指标构成。结论 构建的“双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系比较合理,为评价医学研究生导师培养研究生的过程质量提供依据。

本文引用格式

吴恒璟 , 李金慧 , 吴静 , 钱曙蕾 , 赵艾霞 , 陈琳 . “双一流”高校医学研究生导师评价指标体系初探[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020 , 40(9) : 713 -716 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20191022-00876

Abstract

Objective To explore the evaluation index system of medical postgraduate tutor in double first-class universities.Methods The study preparation was based on preliminary survey, literature research and policies analysis. The study data was collected by two rounds of expert consultation and analyzed by using descriptive analysis, non-parametric test, and weight factor judgment table.Results The overall authority coefficient was 0.84.The Kendall's W coordination coefficient was 0.122, P=0.001, for indicating a high degree of expert concentration and coordination.Conclusions The Evaluation Index System of Medical Postgraduate Tutor in Double First-class Universities has been established, which consists of 3 first-level indexes, 9 second-level indexes and 31 third-level indexes. The study provides a reasonable and effective evaluation system for the process of training postgraduate students by medical tutors.

参考文献

[1] 教育部国务院学位委员会.关于印发《学位与研究生教育发展“十三五”规划》的通知[EB/OL]. (2017-01-17)[2019-06-27]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/s7065/201701/t20170120_295344.html.
[2] 教育部办公厅.关于进一步规范和加强研究生培养管理的通知[EB/OL]. (2019-02-26)[2019-06-27]. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A22/moe_826/201904/t20190412_377698.html.
[3] 陈然.我国高校学术型硕导胜任力评价研究[D]. 福州:福州大学,2017.
[4] 戴志刚.高校硕士生导师岗位胜任力模型构建与测评研究[D]. 南昌:江西师范大学,2017.
[5] 鲁媛媛.硕士生导师综合素质能力评价指标体系的研究[D]. 广州:南方医科大学,2005.
[6] 刘彦彦.高校研究生导师绩效考核指标体系研究[D]. 青岛:青岛大学,2009.
[7] 朱俊利,李珊.基于德尔菲法的临床学院研究生导师评价指标体系初探[J]. 医学与社会,2012,25(12):89-92. DOI:10.3870/YXYSH.2012.12.030.
[8] 陈烨,刘世明,徐名颂.医学研究生导师评价指标体系的构建[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志,2013,12(1):2-5. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2013.01.002.
[9] 孙清雅,万有栋,孙同文, 等.河南省医学研究生与导师双向关系的调查分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2017,37(1):120-124. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.01.026.
文章导航

/