临床教学

多种教学方法相结合在泌尿外科学见习教学中的应用

  • 熊永江 ,
  • 张翾 ,
  • 刘家骥 ,
  • 赵涛 ,
  • 张家模 ,
  • 罗华铭 ,
  • 陈新宇
展开
  • 402160 重庆医科大学附属永川医院泌尿外科(熊永江、张翾、刘家骥、赵涛、张家模、罗华铭);
    150040 哈尔滨,黑龙江中医药大学人体解剖与组织胚胎学教研室(陈新宇)

网络出版日期: 2020-12-09

基金资助

重庆医科大学附属永川医院教学研究课题(YJJC201607)

Application of combination with a variety of teaching methods in clinical practice of urology surgery

  • Xiong Yongjiang ,
  • Zhang Xuan ,
  • Liu Jiaji ,
  • Zhao Tao ,
  • Zhang Jiamo ,
  • Luo Huaming ,
  • Chen Xinyu
Expand
  • Department of Urology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 402160,China(Xiong YJ, Zhang X, Liu JJ, Zhao T, Zhang JM, Luo HM);
    Department of Anatomy and Tissue Embryology, Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine,Harbin 150040,China (Chen XY)

Online published: 2020-12-09

摘要

目的 探讨在泌尿外科学见习教学中采用多种教学方法相结合的教学效果。方法 选取重庆医科大学2011级临床医学专业(全科医学方向)240名学生为研究对象,将其分成实验组和对照组,每组120人。以前列腺增生症为切入点,实验组采用多种教学方法相结合的教学方法,对照组采用传统教学方法。教学结束后,通过统一考核和问卷调查的方式来评价教学效果。结果 实验组学生考核成绩、教学满意度、课堂氛围、动手操作能力以及问题理解深度明显优于对照组学生。结论 多种教学方法相结合的教学有助于激发学生学习兴趣、增强学生团队协作能力、保障每个学生的参与,从而提高教学效果。

本文引用格式

熊永江 , 张翾 , 刘家骥 , 赵涛 , 张家模 , 罗华铭 , 陈新宇 . 多种教学方法相结合在泌尿外科学见习教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2017 , 37(6) : 931 -929 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2017.06.026

Abstract

Objective To explore the teaching effectiveness of combined teaching method in probation teaching of urology surgery.Methods A total of 240 general practice of clinical medicine students doing clinical practice at the Department of urology surgery,the Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical Universitywere selected as study subjects and divided into experimental group and control group with 120 in each group. With the study of prostate hyperplasia, the experimental group was adopted the combined teaching method, and the control group was adopted the lecture-based learning. The teaching outcomes in the two groups were evaluated by a uniform test and a questionnaire survey.Results The examination results, satisfaction, classroom atmosphere, practical operation ability and problem understanding of the students in experimental group were significantly better than the control group.Conclusions Through the combined teaching method, the students' interest in learning was stimulated, the team cooperation ability of students was enhanced, the participation of each student was guaranteed, and the teaching effectiveness was improved.

参考文献

[1] Schmidt HG, Rotgans JI, Yew EH. The process of problem-based learning: what works and why[J]. Med Educ, 2011,45(8):792-806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.
[2] Bosse HM, Nickel M, Huwendiek S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of peer role play and standardized patients in undergraduate communication training[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2015,15:183. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0468-1.

[3] Onyon C. Problem-based learning: a review of the educational and psychological theory[J]. Clin Teach, 2012,9(1):22-26. DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00501.x.
[4] Bokken L, van DJ, Rethans JJ. Performance-related stress symptoms in simulated patients[J]. Med Educ,2004,38(10):1089-1094. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01958.x.
[5] Allchin D. Problem- and case-based learning in science: An introduction to distinctions,values,and outcomes[J].CBE Life Sci Educ, 2013,12(3): 364-372.DOI:10.1187/cbe.12-11-0190.
[6] 龚邦东,汤建平,房星星,等.两种组合教学方法在内科学见习教学中实施效果的比较[J].中华医学教育杂志,2015,35(1):84-86,114.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2015.01.027.
Gong BD,Tang JP,Fang XX, et al. To compare the implementary effects of two kinds of teaching methods on internal medicine clinical practice[J].Chin J Med Edu,2015,35(1):84-86,114. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2015.01.027.
Options
文章导航

/