教学方法

参与式教学方法在妇幼保健学课程教学中的应用

  • 陈春屹 ,
  • 周虹 ,
  • 王海俊 ,
  • 安琳 ,
  • 周敏 ,
  • 罗树生 ,
  • 彭振耀 ,
  • 周钰 ,
  • 高燕秋 ,
  • 康楚云 ,
  • 张小松 ,
  • 周倩龄 ,
  • 王雪茵 ,
  • 刘峥 ,
  • 徐相蓉
展开
  • 1北京大学公共卫生学院妇幼卫生学系 100191;
    2北京大学第一医院妇产科 100034;
    3北京市海淀区妇幼保健院院长办公室 100080;
    4北京市海淀区妇幼保健院科教科 100080

收稿日期: 2019-01-22

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-09

基金资助

2019年度北京大学医学部教育教学研究课题(2019YB09)

Application of participatory teaching in maternal and child health care teaching

  • Chen Chunyi ,
  • Zhou Hong ,
  • Wang Haijun ,
  • An Lin ,
  • Zhou Min ,
  • Luo Shusheng ,
  • Peng Zhenyao ,
  • Zhou Yu ,
  • Gao Yanqiu ,
  • Kang Chuyun ,
  • Zhang Xiaosong ,
  • Zhou Qianling ,
  • Wang Xueyin ,
  • Liu Zheng ,
  • Xu Xiangrong
Expand
  • 1Department of Maternal and Child Health,School of Public Health,Peking University,Beijing 100191,China;
    2Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,Peking University First Hospital,Beijing 100034,China;
    3Administrative Office,Haidian Maternal & Child Health Hospital,Beijing 100080,China;
    4Department of Science and Education,Haidian Maternal & Child Health Hospital,Beijing 100080,China

Received date: 2019-01-22

  Online published: 2020-12-09

摘要

目的 探究参与式教学在妇幼保健学课程教学中的应用效果。方法 选择北京大学公共卫生学院2013级~2014级预防医学专业154名本科学生为研究对象,2014级76名学生为实验组,2013级78名学生为对照组。实验组学生采用小班参与式教学方法,对照组学生采用传统的大班授课式教学方法。采用课程体验问卷调查、专题小组讨论等定量、定性研究方法比较两组学生在教学满意度和课程总体评价方面的差异,并收集实验组学生对小班参与式教学的意见与建议。结果 实验组学生总体满意度、教学体验、基本技能、清晰的目标和标准及合适的作业量等维度的得分分别为(4.24±0.78)分、(4.05±0.57)分、(4.07±0.55)分、(3.90±0.57)分、(3.49±0.78)分,均高于对照组学生(3.92±0.94)分、(3.79±0.76)分、(3.72±0.84)分、(3.59±0.63)分、(3.16±0.67)分,其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。实验组各小班学生对课程评价的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。实验组学生在定性访谈中对小班参与式教学有较好的评价并提出改进意见。结论 妇幼保健学课程小班参与式教学有助于提升学生的教学体验和满意度,有助于提高学生的基本技能,各小班授课效果的一致性较好。小班参与式教学在妇幼保健学课程中具有可行性。

本文引用格式

陈春屹 , 周虹 , 王海俊 , 安琳 , 周敏 , 罗树生 , 彭振耀 , 周钰 , 高燕秋 , 康楚云 , 张小松 , 周倩龄 , 王雪茵 , 刘峥 , 徐相蓉 . 参与式教学方法在妇幼保健学课程教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2019 , 39(9) : 668 -672 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.09.006

Abstract

Objective To research the effectiveness of participatory teaching in maternal and child health care teaching.Methods One hundred and fifty four undergraduate students Majoring in Preventive Medicine from School of Public Health,Peking University were selected as the subjects.Seventy six students in grade 2014 were selected as the experimental group and seventy eight students in grade 2013 as the control group.The experimental group used participatory teaching in small classes,while the control group used traditional teaching in large classes.Quantitative and qualitative research methods such as questionnaire survey and focus group discussion were used to evaluate the intervention effect of maternal and child health courses.Students' satisfaction and overall evaluation of the curriculum were compared and students' opinions and suggestions on participatory teaching in small classes were collected.Results The score of the experimental group in terms of overall satisfaction,good teaching,generic skills,clear goals and standards and appropriate workload were (4.24±0.78,4.05±0.57,4.07±0.55,3.90±0.57,3.49±0.78),which was higher than those in the control group (3.92±0.94,3.79±0.76,3.72±0.84,3.59±0.63,3.16±0.67) (all P<0.05).There were no statistically significant in the overall evaluation of the curriculum among the sub-groups in the intervention group (P>0.05).In focus group discussion,experimental group students had a better evaluation of participatory teaching in small classes and put forward suggestions for curriculum improvement.Conclusions Participatory teaching in maternal and child health care can help to improve student's curriculum experience,satisfaction and basic skills.The teaching effectiveness of each small class has good parallelism.Participatory teaching is feasible in maternal and child health courses.

参考文献

[1] 钱序,陶芳标.妇幼卫生概论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2014:9-11.
[2] 苏文平.参与式教学法在本科教学中的实践创新[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2009,22(3):74-77.
[3] Bates L.Participatory teaching methods in theory and in practice;The schools couneil‘ careers’' project in school[J].Brit J Guid Couns,1983,11(2):113-130.D0I:10.1080/03069888308253751.
[4] Johnson RT,Johnson DW.Action research:Cooperative learning in the science casroom[J].Science and Children,1986,24(2):31-32.
[5] 陶宁,唐红,雍娴婷,等.参与式教学在流行病学实践教学中的应用研究[J].继续医学教育,2016,30( 10):25-27.
[6] 雍娴婷,沈静,阿斯木古丽.克里木,等.参与式教学在儿童少年卫生学实践教学中的应用[J].继续医学教育,2016,30(2):54 -55.DOI:10.3969/jissn.1004 -6763.2016.02.035.
[7] 郭锡永,吴飞,张巍,等.参与式教学方法应用于《妇女保健学》8年的教学实践与评价[J].中国妇幼保健,2004,19(21):18-20.
[8] Broomfield D,Bligh J.An evaluation of the‘ short form’course experience questionnaire with medical students.Med Educ,1998,32( 4):367-369.
[9] Harris C,Kloubee J.Assessment of student experience in a problemn-based leamning course using the course experience questionnaire[J].J Nutr Educ Behav,2014,46(4):315-319.DOI:10.1016/j.jneb.2013.12.002.
[10] 彭琳,王昊,刘智,等.基于课程体验的大学课堂教学质量评估问卷的开发[J].天津职业技术师范大学学报,2012,22(3):74-78.
[11] 顾至欣.高职学生在线开放课程学习体验研究 -以南京旅游职业学院为例[J].中国远程教育(综合版),2019(2):49-58.
[12] Ramsden P.A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education:The course experience questionnaire[J].Stud High Edue,1991,16(2):129-150.DOI:10.1080/030750791 123313 82944.
[1 3] Office of Strategy and Planning,Curtin University.Course experience questionnaire[EB/0L].(2017-12-08)[2019-01-10].http://planning.curtin.edu.au/ mit/ ceq.efm.
[14] 李哲,冯学山.专题小组讨论[J].上海预防医学杂志,2003,15(11):538-539.
[15] 牟字鹏,吉峰.参与式教学对教师角色压力的影响及对策探讨[J].当代教育理论与实践,2016,8(11):102-104.D0I:10.13582/j.cnki.1674 5884.2016.11.032.
文章导航

/