目的 探索“互联网+”时代任务导向式翻转课堂(task-oriented flipped class,TFC)在住院医师规范化培训中的应用。方法 本研究采用试验对照方法。2019年7月,选取2018年1月至2019年6月在海军军医大学长海医院感染科参加住院医师规范化培训的74名学员作为研究对象,将2018年10月至2019年6月参加住院医师规范化培训的38名医师作为试验组,采用TFC教学方法;将2018年1月至9月参加住院医师规范化培训的36名学员作为对照组,采用传统教学方法。通过理论考核、实践考核、日常评价及问卷调查评价教学效果。结果 试验组和对照组总成绩[(208.47±4.58)分比(202.05±5.18)分]、理论考核总分[(81.35±2.79)分比(79.57±3.47)分]、实践考核总分[(84.38±3.34)分比(80.77±3.50)分]及日常评价总分[(42.74±1.44)分比(41.71±1.61)分]的差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。问卷调查结果显示,两组学员除学习兴趣及工作态度方面综合态度系数F近似外,其他各项试验组学员均明显较高,试验组对自主学习能力、沟通表达能力及人文素质提高最为明显(0.671比0.431,0.750比0.472,0.566比0.319)。结论 “互联网+”时代TFC教学方法有助于提高住院医师的理论及实践教学效果和综合能力,受到住院医师的较高评价。
Objective To explore the effect of task-oriented flipped class(TFC) in residency training during “Internet plus” era. Methods The experimental control method was used.In July 2019, a total of 74 residents who received standardized training in the department of infection of Changhai Hospital of the Naval Medical University were included. They were divided into TFC group and traditional class(TC) group. The scores of basic theory, clinical skills,daily performance and the results of questionnaire survey were used to evaluate the teaching effectiveness and satisfaction. Results The total score of TFC group was significantly higher than that of TC Group[(208.47±4.58) vs (202.05±5.18),(81.35±2.79) vs (79.57±3.47),(84.38±3.34) vs (80.77±3.50), (42.74±1.44) vs (41.71±1.61), all P<0.05].The results showed that the TFC group has the most significant improvement in self-learning ability, communication and expression ability and humanistic quality(0.671 vs 0.431,0.750 vs 0.472,0.566 vs 0.319).Conclusions “Internet plus” era task oriented flip classroom helps to improve the theoretical and practical teaching effect and students' comprehensive ability, and it is highly evaluated by students.
[1] 宁家骏.“互联网+”行动计划的实施背景、内涵及主要内容[J].电子政务,2015(6):32-38.
[2]冯照力.任务导向教学法在儿科护理学教学中的应用[J].卫生职业教育,2012,30(9):85-86.
[3]Strayer JF.How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation,innovation and task orientation[J].Learning Environ Res,2012,15:171-193. DOI: 10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4.
[4]钟伟金,李佳,杨兴菊.共词分析法研究(三)——共词聚类分析法的原理与特点[J].情报杂志,2008,27(7):118-120. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1965.2008.07.038.
[5]潘懋元.高等教育研究方法[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2008:199-203.
[6]胡小磊,陈卫东,孙卫华,等.PBL联合CBL教学法在内分泌科住院医师规范化培训教学中的应用[J].中华全科医学,2017,15(7):1236-1238.DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.07.043.
[7]艾尼瓦尔·艾木都拉, 胡尔西旦·那斯尔, 包永星. CBL 与 PBL 双轨教学模式在临床肿瘤学教学中的应用探索[J].新疆医科大学学报,2014(7):957-959.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5551.2014.07.039.
[8]张胜逆,张涛.任务导向性学习与“互联网+”结合对医学生培养医学胜任力的初步探讨[J].卫生职业教育,2018,36(24):35-36.