中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 >

2020 , Vol. 40 >Issue 4: 316 - 320

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20190909-00735

医学教育评估

医学研究生满意度量表的构建及其信度和效度分析

  • 张驰 ,
  • 李欣 ,
  • 贾金忠 ,
  • 黄天壬 ,
  • 刘德平
展开
  • 1北京医院教育处 国家老年医学中心 中国医学科学院老年医学研究院 100730;
    2广西医科大学研究生院综合办公室,南宁 530021;
    3北京大学研究生院医学部分院 全国医学专业学位研究生教育指导委员会秘书处办公室 100191;
    4广西医科大学附属肿瘤医院实验研究部,南宁 530022

收稿日期: 2019-09-09

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

基金资助

中国学位与研究生教育学会重点课题(A2-2017Y0502-005);中国学位与研究生教育学会医学专业学位委员会立项课题(A1-YX20180201-02)

收起

Construction and reliability and validity analysis of satisfaction scale for medical graduates

  • Zhang Chi ,
  • Li Xin ,
  • Jia Jinzhong ,
  • Huang Tianren ,
  • Liu Deping
Expand
  • 1Education Department of Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology & Institute of Geriatrics Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China;
    2General Office of Graduate School of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China;
    3Graduate School Health Science Center of Peking University & Secretariat Office of National Steering Committee for Medical Professional Degree Education, Beijing 100191, China;
    4Experimental Research Department of Guangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, Nanning 530021, China

Received date: 2019-09-09

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Supported by

Research Subject of Chinese Society for Academic Degree and Graduate Education(A2-2017Y0502-005);Research Subject of Medical Professional Degree Committee of Chinese Society for Academic Degree and Graduate Education(A1-YX20180201-02)

Fold

摘要

目的 构建医学研究生满意度量表并对其信度和效度进行评估分析。方法 2017年9月,对广西医科大学的2 961名在读全日制研究生进行满意度问卷调查。利用探索性因子分析方法构建了满意度量表的维度并评价效度,利用验证性因子分析方法验证量表的适配性。结果 满意度量表共包含31个条目,总体克朗巴赫系数为0.972;经主成分法提取出5个公因子,累计贡献率达到81.09%。验证性因子分析结果显示,调查量表修正后,卡方自由度比χ2/df为4.451 (95%CI=4.321~4.558),近似误差均方根(root mean square error of approximation,RMSEA)为0.062 (95%CI=0.058~0.069),其他增值适配度指标均大于0.9;各条目的标准化载荷均超过0.71,且均具有统计学意义 (t>1.96, P<0.05)。结论 医学研究生满意度量表具有良好的信度和效度,且适用性良好,可以作为医学研究生满意度的调查工具并推广使用。

关键词： 医学研究生; 因子分析; 满意度; 信度; 效度

本文引用格式

张驰 , 李欣 , 贾金忠 , 黄天壬 , 刘德平 . 医学研究生满意度量表的构建及其信度和效度分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020 , 40(4) : 316 -320 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20190909-00735

Abstract

Objective To construct the satisfaction scale for medical graduates and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods Totally 2 961 full-time postgraduates from Guangxi Medical University were investigated in September 2017. Exploratory factor analysis was used to construct dimensions and evaluate the validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to verify the scale's fitness. Results A total of 31 items were included in the scale. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.972. Five common factors were extracted by the principal components method and the cumulative contribution rate reached 81.09%. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that χ2/df was 4.451 (95%CI=4.321~4.558), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.062 (95%CI=0.058~0.069),other value-added fitness indicators were all over 0.9;the standardized load of each item was over 0.71 and had statistical significance(t>1.96, P<0.05). Conclusions The scale has good reliability,validity and applicability. It can be used as a tool to evaluate satisfaction for medical graduates.

Key words： Medical graduate; Factor analysis; Satisfaction; Reliability; Validity

参考文献

[1] 周文辉, 黄欢, 付鸿飞, 等. 2017年我国研究生满意度调查[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(9):41-47. DOI: 10.16750/j.adge.2017.09.008.
[2]Raykov T, Dimitrov DM, Marcoulides GA, et al. On the connections between item response theory and classical test theory: a note on true score evaluation for polytomous items via item response modeling[J]. Educ Psychol Meas, 2019,79(6):1198-1209. DOI: 10.1177/0013164417745949.
[3]李跃平, 黄子杰. 验证性因子分析在量表结构效度考核中作用[J].中国公共卫生,2007,23(10):1198-1199. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-0580.2007.10.024.
[4]Barrett P. Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit[J]. Personality & Individual Differences, 2007, 42(5):815-824.DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.018.
[5]吴明隆. 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用[M]. 重庆:重庆大学出版社, 2010:24-27.
[6]戴明叶.基于结构方程模型的顾客满意度研究——以湖南省博物馆为例[D].长沙:湖南师范大学, 2014.
[7]Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation Modeling[M]. New York: Guilford Press, 1998:133-145.
[8]Ecklund-Johnson E, Miller SA, Sweet JJ. Confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioral dyscontrol scale in a mixed clinical sample[J]. Clin Neuropsychol, 2004,18(3):395-410. DOI: 10.1080/1385404049052415.
[9]Chibnall JT, Tait RC. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in African American and Caucasian Workers' Compensation claimants with low back injuries[J]. Pain, 2005,113(3):369-375. DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.016.
[10]薛二勇, 刘淼, 李健. 我国教育公平发展政策变迁的历程、特征与趋势[J].教育研究,2019(5):142-150.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉