教学方法

复盘教学方式在临床基本技能教学中的应用

  • 杨闻 ,
  • 李力 ,
  • 季湘年 ,
  • 舒晓刚 ,
  • 阮满真 ,
  • 龚洁 ,
  • 彭妙 ,
  • 杨光耀
展开
  • 1华中科技大学同济医学院第一临床学院临床技能中心,武汉 430022;
    2深圳市卫生计生能力建设和继续教育中心,深圳 518020;
    3华中科技大学同济医学院第一临床学院,武汉 430022;
    4华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院胃肠外科,武汉 430022

收稿日期: 2019-04-03

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

基金资助

华中科技大学教学改革课题(2018132)

The role of debriefing in clinical skill teaching and its application

  • Yang Wen ,
  • Li Li ,
  • Ji Xiangnian ,
  • Shu Xiaogang ,
  • Ruan Manzhen ,
  • Gong Jie ,
  • Peng Miao ,
  • Yang Guangyao
Expand
  • 1The Clinical Skills Center, the First Clinical College, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China;
    2Health and Family Planning Capacity Building and Continuing Education Center of Shenzhen Municipality, Shenzhen 518020,China;
    3The First Clinical College, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Sciene and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China;
    4Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Sciene and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China

Received date: 2019-04-03

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Supported by

Medical Education Research Subject of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(2018132)

摘要

目的 探讨复盘教学方式在临床基本技能教学中的应用效果。 方法 选取华中科技大学同济医学院第一临床学院八年制临床医学专业96名学生作为研究对象,将2014级53名学生设为试验组,以复盘教学方式实施临床基本技能教学;将2013级43名学生设为对照组,以传统教学方式实施临床基本技能教学。教学结束后,比较两组学生考核成绩,了解试验组学生对复盘教学方式的反馈情况。结果 试验组学生操作考核成绩高于对照组学生[(94.76±0.18)分比(83.32±0.59)分],差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。试验组中,92.3%(48/52)的学生认为自主学习能力得到了提高;86.5%(45/52)的学生认为学习效率得到了提高。 结论 复盘教学方式有效提高了学生临床基本技能的学习能力和效率,有利于学生对临床基本技能的掌握。

本文引用格式

杨闻 , 李力 , 季湘年 , 舒晓刚 , 阮满真 , 龚洁 , 彭妙 , 杨光耀 . 复盘教学方式在临床基本技能教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020 , 40(1) : 30 -33 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.01.008

Abstract

Objective To explore the role and application potential of debriefing in clinical skill teaching. Methods Fifty-three students from Eight-year program of clinical medicine of Grade 2014 in Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology are collected as the experimental group, another 43 students from Eight-year program of clinical medicine of Grade 2013 as the control group. The experimental group adopted the teaching mode of debriefing and the control group received the traditional teaching mode. By the end of training sessions, the differences between the two groups in both the skill assessments and the theories were compared. A satisfaction survey about the debriefing was made in the experimental group. Results The scores of theoretical assessment in experimental group was (78.32±1.55). The scores of skill assessments was (94.76±0.18). The difference of the skill assessment scores between the experimental group and the control group was statistically significant (P<0.05). The questionnaire survey in the experimental group showed that the debriefing teaching method could improve the ability of independent learning 92.3%(48/52) and increase the learning efficiency 86.5%(45/52). Conclusions The application of debriefing significantly improved the outcome of clinical skill training, as compared to the traditional teaching mode.

参考文献

[1] 张志鹏,王港,徐智,等. 模拟教学在医学生外科手术基本技能操作训练中的应用效果[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2018, 38(4): 575-578. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.04.022.
[2]陈中.复盘:对过去的事情做思维演练[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2013:18-19.
[3] 崔志林,赵浩华. 领导者复盘意识的运用与提升方略[J]. 领导科学, 2019 (19): 60-61,62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2606.2019.19.021.
[4]耿志超,史霆. 在医学模拟教学中开展反馈性任务报告的重要性分析[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2014,13(3): 260-263. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2014.03.014.
[5] McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, et al. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009[J]. Med Educ, 2010, 44(1):50-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x.
[6] Levine AI, DeMaria S, Schwartz AD, et al. 模拟医学[M].吕建平,译.北京:人民卫生出版社,2017:23.
[7] 耿志超,许臻晔,匡洁,等.反馈性任务报告在临床模拟实训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志, 2016, 15(4): 397-402. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2016.04.019.
[8] Merriam SB. Andragogy and self-directed learning: pillars of adult learning theory[J]. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 2001(89):3-14.
[9] Sweller J, Ayres P, Kalyuga S. Cognitive load theory[M]. New York: Springer; 2011:19-20.
文章导航

/