心理健康教育

“3+2”助理全科医师项目学生的心理健康状况调查

  • 高立雅 ,
  • 杜鹃
展开
  • 1首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院成人学历教育办公室,北京 100069;
    2首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院全科医学办公室,北京 100069

收稿日期: 2019-04-10

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

Analysis of “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students' mental health by university personality inventory

  • Gao Liya ,
  • Du Juan
Expand
  • 1Adult Education Office, School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China;
    2General Practice Office, School of General Practice and Continuing Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China

Received date: 2019-04-10

  Online published: 2020-12-08

摘要

目的 调研“3+2”助理全科医师项目新生的心理健康状况。方法 从2017年2月起,采用大学生人格问卷(university personality inventory,UPI)对首都医科大学2017级~2019级“3+2”项目新入学学生进行调查,采用秩和检验和χ2检验等统计方法对数据进行分析。结果 可能存在严重心理问题(Ⅰ类)的学生占比15.5%(58/375),可能存在一般心理问题(Ⅱ类)的学生占比22.1%(83/375),心理健康状况相对良好(Ⅲ类)的学生占比62.4%(234/375)。男生UPI评分为3.00(1.00,9.00)分,女生4.00(1.00,10.75)分;2017级学生UPI评分为4.00(1.00,12.50)分,2018级4.00(1.00,10.00)分,2019级3.00(1.00,8.00)分;各区县学生评分分别为大兴7.50(2.00,19.25)分,平谷3.00(1.00,10.00)分,通州6.00(1.00,11.00)分,门头沟2.00(1.00,4.00)分,怀柔9.00(3.00,13.00)分,密云4.00(1.00,11.50)分,延庆3.00(1.25,8.25)分,昌平4.00(1.00,10.25)分,顺义3.00(1.00,8.00)分,房山2.00(1.00,7.00)分。不同性别、年级、区县学生的评分差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 大部分“3+2”项目学生的心理健康状况良好,不同性别、年级、区县学生心理健康状况相近。应当重视学生心理健康问题,为其搭建稳定的心理健康教育体系,根据学生心理健康特点开展特色心理疏导服务。

本文引用格式

高立雅 , 杜鹃 . “3+2”助理全科医师项目学生的心理健康状况调查[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020 , 40(1) : 21 -24 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.01.006

Abstract

Objective To investigate the mental health status of newly-enrolled “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students. Methods The investigation started in February 2017 covered 375 newly-enrolled “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students to complete university personality inventory (UPI) from 2017 to 2019, and rank sum test and chi-square test was used to analysis data. Results Students who were highly potential to have serious psychological problems (Type Ⅰ) take 15.5%(58/375), students who were possible to have general mental issues (Type Ⅱ) take 22.1%(83/375) , students who were relatively mentally healthy (Type Ⅲ) take 62.4% (234/375). UPI score of male was 3.00(1.00,9.00), female was 4.00(1.00,10.75), grade 2017 was 4.00(1.00,12.50), grade 2018 was 4.00(1.00,10.00), grade 2019 was 3.00(1.00,8.00), Daxing was 7.50(2.00,19.25), Pinggu was 3.00(1.00,10.00), Tongzhou was 6.00(1.00,11.00), Mentougou was 2.00(1.00,4.00), Huairou was 9.00(3.00,13.00), Miyun was 4.00(1.00,11.50), Yanqing was 3.00(1.25,8.25), Changping was 4.00(1.00,10.25), Shunyi was 3.00(1.00,8.00), Fangshan was 2.00(1.00,7.00). No significant difference was found among students enrolled from 2017 up to 2019, between male and females and different districts(all P>0.05). Conclusions Most of “3+2” assistant general practitioner program students had good mental health, and it was similar in different gender, grade and district. For the students of “3+2” program, we should give highly concern and construct stable mental health system, provide special consulting service according to students' metal health features.

参考文献

[1] 卫生部,教育部.助理全科医生培训标准(试行)[Z].2012-09-10.
[2] 张东海,马秀华,刚君,等. 北京市实施“3+2”助理全科医师培训《临床综合课程》3年回顾[J]. 中华全科医学, 2017, 15(12): 2003-2007. DOI:10.16766/j.cnki.issn.1674-4152.2017.12.001.
[3] 黄艳,线福华,赵丽莉,等. “3+2”助理全科医师培养模式的探索与实践[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2014, 34(1): 31-33. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2014.01.009.
[4] 莫丽. 高职新生UPI心理健康调查分析及对策[J]. 职业教育研究, 2014 (1): 30-32.
[5] 高承慧. 艺术类大学新生心理健康UPI调查分析[J]. 新西部(下旬刊), 2013 (6): 145.
[6] 林玉琳,刘扬. “3+2”助理全科医生培养模式实施的调查与分析[J]. 继续医学教育, 2018, 32(3): 87-88. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2018.03.042.
[7] 吴钰. 硕士研究生新生心理健康状况调查[J]. 中国健康心理学杂志, 2012, 20(1): 131-133.
[8] 单炯,赵洁,刘瑜婕. 全科医师规范化培训的回顾分析[J]. 中国全科医学, 2010, 13(4): 353-355. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9572.2010.04.006.
[9] 马静敏. 回龙观社区“3+2”助理全科医师教学实践基地教学实践方法与思考[J]. 继续医学教育,2016,30(10): 1-2. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2016.10.001.
文章导航

/