人文素质教育

医学生生命价值观和共情与亲社会倾向的关系研究

  • 贺雯 ,
  • 员秀 ,
  • 李冬梅
展开
  • 上海师范大学心理学系 200234

收稿日期: 2019-03-07

  网络出版日期: 2020-12-08

基金资助

国家社会科学基金项目(17BSH093)

Relationship between life values empathy and prosocial tendencies of medical students

  • He Wen ,
  • Yun Xiu ,
  • Li Dongmei
Expand
  • Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China

Received date: 2019-03-07

  Online published: 2020-12-08

Supported by

The National Social Science Fund of China(17BSH093)

摘要

目的 探讨医学生生命价值观与亲社会倾向的关系,以及共情在其关系间的中介作用。方法 本研究于2018年3月至2018年6月实施,选取上海交通大学医学院、上海中医药大学、上海健康医学院、南京医科大学、内蒙古医科大学等5所医学院校的528名医学生为研究对象,采用大学生生命价值观量表、青少年亲社会倾向量表和杰弗逊共情量表对其进行调查。同时,使用结构方程模型探讨共情在医学生生命价值观与亲社会倾向关系间的中介作用。结果 医学生生命价值观与共情及其3个维度、亲社会倾向均存在正相关,相关系数介于0.19~0.55。共情及其观点采择维度与亲社会倾向存在正相关,相关系数分别为0.32和0.61;情感关注维度、换位思考维度与亲社会倾向没有相关。中介效应检验表明,生命价值观既可以直接正向预测医学生的亲社会倾向(β=0.57, P<0.01),也可以通过共情的观点采择维度间接预测医学生的亲社会倾向(β=0.17, P <0.01)。结论 医学生共情与生命价值观和亲社会倾向密切相关,共情在生命价值观与亲社会倾向之间起着部分中介作用。

本文引用格式

贺雯 , 员秀 , 李冬梅 . 医学生生命价值观和共情与亲社会倾向的关系研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2020 , 40(1) : 11 -15 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.01.004

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationship between life values and prosocial tendencies of medical students and the mediating effect of empathy. Methods From March to June 2018, 528 medical students were selected from five medical colleges including Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai University of Medicine&Health Sciences, Nanjing Medical University, Inner Mongolia Medical University. Using the College Students' Life Values Scale, the Adolescent Prosocial Tendency Scale, and the Jefferson's Empathy Scale (JSE) to investigate. And the structural equation model was used to research the mediating effect of empathy on relationship between life values and prosocial tendencies. Results There was a positive correlation between the life values and empathy and it's three dimensions, as well as prosocial tendencies, the correlation coefficient is between 0.19 and 0.55.There was a positive correlation between empathy and perspective taking and prosocial tendencies, the correlation coefficients are 0.32 and 0.61 respectively; While there was no correlation between emotional nursing and transpositional consideration and prosocial tendencies. Path analysis revealed that life values predicted directly prosocial tendencies(β=0.57, P<0.01), and predicted prosocial tendencies through empathy(β=0.17, P <0.01). Conclusions The empathy may be associated with life values and prosocial tendencies and play a partial mediating effect between life values and prosocial tendencies in medical students.

参考文献

[1] 杨秀木, 郭宏艳, 申正付, 等. 志愿动机与志愿行为:亲社会倾向的中介作用[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2017,42(7):963-967. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2017.07.041.
[2]章志光. 社会心理学[M]. 北京: 人民教育出版社, 1996:496-525.
[3]Alessandri G, Luengo KBP, Eisenberg N, et al. Prosociality during the transition from late adolescence to young adulthood: the role of effortful control and ego-resiliency[J]. Pers Soc Psychol Bull, 2014,40(11):1451-1465. DOI: 10.1177/0146167214549321.
[4]McDonald KL, Benish-Weisman M, O'Brien CT, et al. The social values of aggressive-prosocial youth[J]. J Youth Adolesc, 2015,44(12):2245-2256. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-014-0246-0.
[5]Knight GP, Carlo G, Basilio CD, et al. Familismvalues, perspective taking, and prosocial moral reasoning: predicting prosocial tendencies among Mexican American adolescents[J]. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2014, 25(4):717-727.
[6]寇彧, 张庆鹏. 青少年亲社会行为的概念表征研究[J].社会学研究,2006(5):169-187,245.
[7]段利强. “90后”大学生生命价值观调研分析及培育路径[J].哈尔滨职业技术学院学报,2017(6):85-87.
[8]Davis AN, Carlo G, Knight GP. Perceived maternal parenting styles, cultural values, and prosocial tendencies among mexican American youth[J]. J Genet Psychol, 2015,176(3-4):235-252. DOI: 10.1080/00221325.2015.1044494.
[9]Knight GP, Carlo G. Prosocial development among mexican American youth[J]. Child Development Perspectives, 2012, 6(3):258-263.
[10]Batson CD, Eklund JH, Chermok VL, et al. An additional antecedent of empathic concern: valuing the welfare of the person in need[J]. J Pers Soc Psychol, 2007,93(1):65-74. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.65.
[11]Edele A, Dziobek I, Keller M. Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game:the role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity[J]. Learning & Individual Differences, 2013, 24(5):96-102.
[12]Flook L, Goldberg SB, Pinger L, et al. Promoting prosocial behavior and self-regulatory skills in preschool children through a mindfulness-based kindness curriculum[J]. Dev Psychol, 2015,51(1):44-51. DOI: 10.1037/a0038256.
[13]安连超, 耿艳萌, 陈靖涵, 等. 大学生共情与亲社会行为的关系[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2017,25(9):1369-1371. DOI: 10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.09.024.
[14] 张海形. 观点采择与共情反应对助人行为的影响:群体关系的调节作用[D]. 杭州:浙江师范大学, 2009.
[15] Smith A. Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution[J]. Psychological Record, 2006, 56(1):3-21.
[16]胡月. 大学生生命价值观对自杀意念的影响[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2015.
[17]寇彧, 洪慧芳, 谭晨, 等. 青少年亲社会倾向量表的修订[J].心理发展与教育,2007,23(1):112-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4918.2007.01.020.
[18]李霞, 孙宏玉. 杰斐逊共情量表(护生版)的编译及信效度检验[J].中华现代护理杂志,2011,17(24):2853-2856. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2011.24.001.
[19]贾国燕, 王文姮. 论医学生生命教育体系的构建[J].中国医学伦理学,2015,28(2):237-239.
[20]陈秋余. 医学生生命价值观的现状调查与分析[J].江西教育学院学报,2013,34(1):62-66. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3638.2013.01.016.
[21]Chigusa S, Moroi T, Shoji Y. State-of-the-Art calculation of the decay rate of electroweak vacuum in the standard model[J]. Phys Rev Lett, 2017,119(21):211801. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.211801.
[22]Eisenberg N, Zhou Q, Koller S. Brazilian adolescents' prosocial moral judgment and behavior: relations to sympathy, perspective taking, gender-role orientation, and demographic characteristics[J]. Child Development, 2010, 72(2):518-534.
文章导航

/