目的 探究医学院校教师参与学校共同治理的典型类型,为激发医学院校教师参与学校共同治理积极性提供理论参考。方法 2025年6至8月,对黑龙江省某医学院校的18名教师进行半结构化访谈,基于扎根理论研究方法,采用NVivo20质性分析软件对访谈资料进行三级编码分析。结果 提炼出医学院校教师参与学校共同治理的4种主要类型:被动响应型参与、选举指派型参与、情感驱动型参与和赋能协作型参与。结论 医学院校教师参与学校共同治理呈现多元化类型,建议对被动响应型教师重塑角色认知与构建赋能机制、对选举指派型教师明确权利责任与强化激励引导、对情感驱动型教师搭建情感反馈与价值认可衔接机制、对赋能协作型教师构建资源支撑与开放信任的协作环境,以此强化教师在学校共同治理中的主体地位,推动构建多元协同、高效运行的共同治理新格局。
秦夏夏
,
田轶男
,
吴玉华
,
沈月娥
,
马星
,
李晓萌
,
Sundas Bint e Ehsan
,
张淑娥
,
杨立斌
. 医学院校教师参与学校共同治理的类型分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2026
, 46(7)
: 481
-485
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20251210-01603
Objective To explore typical models of teachers' participation in shared governance in medical schools and inform medical schools to effectively stimulate teachers' enthusiasm for participation therein. Methods From June to August 2025, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 teachers from a medical school in Heilongjiang Province. The interview data were analyzed using a three-level coding process based on grounded theory, with the aid of NVivo 20 qualitative analysis software. Results Four primary types of participation by medical school teachers in shared governance have been identified: passive-responsive participation, elected-appointed participation, emotionally-driven participation, and empowered-collaborative participation. Conclusions The participation of medical school teachers in shared governance takes various forms. It is recommended that, for teachers who adopt a passive, reactive approach, their role perception should be reshaped, and mechanisms for empowerment should be established; for those appointed through election, their rights and responsibilities should be clarified, and incentives and guidance should be strengthened; for those driven by emotional factors, mechanisms linking emotional feedback with recognition of their value should be established; and for those who are empowered and collaborative, a collaborative environment characterized by resource support and open trust should be fostered. This will serve to reinforce the central role of teachers in shared governance and promote the establishment of a new framework for shared governance characterized by diverse collaboration and efficient operation.
[1] 童卫丰, 张璐, 施俊庆. 利益与合力:基于利益相关者理论的产教融合及其实施路径[J].教育发展研究,2022,42(17):67-73. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-3855.2022.17.011.
[2]王辰, 马超. 以新医科建设为契机 推动医学教育创新发展[J].中国高等教育,2022(12):15-17.
[3]刘畅, 胡珏, 卢芳国,等. “人工智能+教育”时代背景下医学教育教学改革与发展研究——以免疫学基础与病原生物学为例[J].中国免疫学杂志,2025,41(6):1315-1319. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-484X.2025.06.008.
[4]卢海丽, 张立国, 刘晓琳. 虚拟流动教师持续智力资源贡献影响因素研究——基于扎根理论的质性分析[J].电化教育研究,2025,46(5):56-63. DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2025.05.008.
[5]朱丽燕, 张淑娥, 赵鑫, 等. 高等医学院校共同治理中的教师参与困境和路径选择[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(7):577-581. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201029-01529.
[6]贾旭东, 衡量. 扎根理论的“丛林”、过往与进路[J].科研管理,2020,41(5):151-163. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2020.05.016.
[7]陈向明. 扎根理论在中国教育研究中的运用探索[J].北京大学教育评论,2015,13(1):2-15,188. DOI: 10.19355/j.cnki.1671-9468.2015.01.002.
[8]蔡婉怡. 教师成长的生命境遇检视及意蕴重构[J].现代教育科学,2025(1):103-109,117.DOI: 10.13980/j.cnki.xdjykx.2025.01.017.
[9]汪新建, 柴佩星. 从“学理”到“治理”:中国医患社会心态研究的学术演进(1980—2021)[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2022,59(2):48-54. DOI: 10.16783/j.cnki.nwnus.2022.02.005.
[10]刘蕾, 闫建璋. 社会结构论视域下我国大学教师形象的解析与重构[J].江苏高教,2025(9):55-62. DOI: 10.13236/j.cnki.jshe.2025.09.008.
[11]李明蔚, 张思, 张津铭, 等. 人机协同视域下的教师研修:价值内涵、表征形态与实践进路[J].电化教育研究,2025,46(4):93-98,113. DOI: 10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2025.04.013.