人工智能(artificial intelligence,AI)技术在医学领域的广泛应用,正重塑着医学边界。AI技术不仅显著提升了医疗服务的效率和诊断决策的精准性,也为医学人文教育的场景化教学、实践化发展、精准化评估带来新机遇。同时,AI技术本身的局限性和医生过度依赖等原因,也导致了医生综合能力弱化、医患信任危机和医疗责任界定困难等问题,这使医学人文教育面临新挑战。近年来,中山大学附属第一医院通过顶层设计、全周期融合式人文教育课程体系重构、“跨学科和复合型”AI+师资队伍建设、多元评价体系建立和院企协同创新等多方面举措,将AI技术与医学人文教育充分融合,在保持医学人文教育核心地位的同时,充分运用AI技术赋能,培养兼具临床胜任力与医学人文精神的复合型医学人才,为健康中国战略下的医学人文教育改革提供参考。
The wide application of artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the medical field is reshaping the boundaries of medicine. AI technology not only significantly improves the efficiency of medical services and the accuracy of diagnostic decisions, but also brings new opportunities for scenario-based teaching, practice-oriented development, and precision assessment in medical humanities education. At the same time, due to the inherent limitations of AI technology itself and the excessive reliance on it by doctors, problems such as the weakening of doctors′ comprehensive capabilities, the crisis of physician-patient trust, and the difficulty in defining medical responsibilities have arisen, putting medical humanities education face to face with new challenges. In recent years, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University has fully integrated AI technology with medical humanities education through various initiatives, including top-level design, the reconstruction of a full-cycle integrated humanities education curriculum system, the construction of an interdisciplinary and composite ″AI+″ faculty team, the establishment of a diversified evaluation system, and hospital-industry collaborative innovation. While maintaining the core position of medical humanities education, the hospital has fully leveraged AI technology for empowerment, aiming to cultivate composite medical professionals with both clinical competence and medical humanistic spirit, and provide references for the reform of medical humanities education under the Healthy China strategy.
[1] Mudgal SK, Agarwal R, Chaturvedi J, et al. Real-world application, challenges and implication of artificial intelligence in healthcare: an essay[J]. Pan Afr Med J, 2022,43:3. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.43.3.33384.
[2] Odusami M, Maskeliūnas R, Damaševiĉius R. An intelligent system for early recognition of Alzheimer′ disease using neuroimaging[J]. Sensors (Basel), 2022,22(3):740.DOI: 10.3390/s22030740.
[3] Lu MY, Chen B, Williamson D, et al. A multimodal generative AI copilot for human pathology[J]. Nature, 2024,634(8033):466-473. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07618-3.
[4] 胡大一. 让“双心医学”服务模式落地——充分重视精神心理问题的医生教育和科普[J].中国全科医学,2019,22(18):2150-2151. DOI: 10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2019.00.140.
[5] 张璨. 实施医学人文关怀提升行动的价值依据与着力点思考[J].中国医学伦理学,2025,38(4):522-530. DOI: 10.12026/j.issn.1001-8565.2025.04.16.
[6] 王晨, 龙艺, 胡安霞, 等. 全国高等院校医学人文教育现状与对策研究[J].医学与哲学,2022,43(5):61-66. DOI: 10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2022.05.12.
[7] 石中英. 回归教育本体——当前我国教育评价体系改革刍议[J].教育研究,2020,41(9):4-15.
[8] 段志光, 王晨, 石嫣, 等. 大健康理念下医学人文教育改革发展的思考[J].中华医学教育杂志,2025,45(1):11-20. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240930-01017.
[9] 彭树涛, 王露岚. 我国医学人文融合教育模式的构建及其路径[J].中华医学教育杂志,2025,45(1):21-25. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240925-01002.
[10] Lee JP, Jang H, Jang Y, et al. Encoding of multi-modal emotional information via personalized skin-integrated wireless facial interface[J]. Nat Commun, 2024,15(1):530. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44673-2.
[11] Garcia P, Ma SP, Shah S, et al. Artificial intelligence-generated draft replies to patient inbox messages[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024,7(3):e243201. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3201.
[12] Tu T, Schaekermann M, Palepu A, et al. Towards conversational diagnostic artificial intelligence[J]. Nature, 2025,642(8067):442-450. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-025-08866-7.
[13] Mohanasundari SK, Kalpana M, Madhusudhan U, et al. Can artificial intelligence replace the unique nursing role?[J]. Cureus, 2023,15(12):e51150. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.51150.
[14] 刘文浩.人工智能与医学的融合:现状、挑战与未来[J].科学之友, 2024(9):149-151. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8136.2024.09.067.
[15] Yang K, Zeng Z, Peng H, et al. Attitudes of Chinese cancer patients toward the clinical use of artificial intelligence[J]. Patient Prefer Adherence, 2019,13:1867-1875. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S225952.
[16] Bærøe K, Gundersen T, Henden E, et al. Can medical algorithms be fair? Three ethical quandaries and one dilemma[J]. BMJ Health Care Inform, 2022,29(1):e100445.DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100445.
[17] Ongena YP, Haan M, Yakar D, et al. Patients′ views on the implementation of artificial intelligence in radiology: development and validation of a standardized questionnaire[J]. Eur Radiol, 2020,30(2):1033-1040. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06486-0.
[18] Vo V, Chen G, Aquino Y, et al. Multi-stakeholder preferences for the use of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a systematic review and thematic analysis[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2023,338:116357. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116357.
[19] Gao S, He L, Chen Y, et al. Public perception of artificial intelligence in medical care: content analysis of social media[J]. J Med Internet Res, 2020,22(7):e16649. DOI: 10.2196/16649.
[20] Li W, Liu X. Anxiety about artificial intelligence from patient and doctor-physician[J]. Patient Educ Couns, 2025,133:108619. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108619.
[21] Benjamin R. Assessing risk, automating racism[J]. Science, 2019,366(6464):421-422. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz3873.
[22] Sullivan HR, Schweikart SJ. Are current tort liability doctrines adequate for addressing injury caused by AI?[J]. AMA J Ethics, 2019,21(2):E160-166. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.160.
[23] Jong M. Transforming medical education in the AI era: balancing technological expertise with humanistic care in tomorrow′s doctors[J]. Ann Acad Med Singap,2024 ,53(12):754-757. DOI : 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2024242.
[24] 姜怡龄, 焦井泉, 季梅, 等. 医学生人文素养的培养与实践—以上海交通大学医学院为例[J].医学教育管理,2023,9(3):410-414. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2023.03.024.
[25] 曹云飞,陈金梅.医学人文教育的使命及其改革初探[J].中国高等医学教育,2010(12):21-23. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2010.12.011.
