医学教育管理

我国56所高等医学院校2019至2022学年本科教学经费的支出规模与结构分析

  • 宋岩 ,
  • 靳岩鹏 ,
  • 王思璠 ,
  • 刘佳楠 ,
  • 段严寒 ,
  • 陈皓阳 ,
  • 吴海江
展开
  • 河北医科大学医教协同与医学教育研究中心,石家庄 050017

收稿日期: 2024-11-06

  网络出版日期: 2025-10-30

基金资助

河北省社会科学基金项目(HB24JY022)

Analysis of expenditure scale and structure of undergraduate teaching funds in 56 Chinese medical colleges between 2019 and 2022

  • Song Yan ,
  • Jin Yanpeng ,
  • Wang Sifan ,
  • Liu Jianan ,
  • Duan Yanhan ,
  • Chen Haoyang ,
  • Wu Haijiang
Expand
  • Medical-Education Coordination and Medical Education Research Center, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050017, China

Received date: 2024-11-06

  Online published: 2025-10-30

Supported by

Social Science Foundation of Hebei Province(HB24JY022)

摘要

目的 分析我国高等医学院校本科教学经费支出情况,期望为医学院校本科教学经费管理提供依据。方法 采用文本资料分析方法,数据来源于我国56所高等医学院校2019至2022学年发布的《本科教学质量报告》,采用描述性统计分析和非参数秩和检验,分析比较不同地区、不同隶属关系和不同类别的医学院校的本科教学经费支出规模和结构。结果 2019至2022学年,56所医学院校本科教学经费总支出从58.88亿元增长到64.02亿元,但生均支出从1.68万元下降至1.55万元。支出结构,2021-2022学年生均教学日常运行支出为0.64万元,生均本科专项教学经费支出为0.74万元。2021-2022学年生均支出,由高至低地区依次为东部2.14(1.59)万元、西部1.14(0.81)万元、中部0.94(0.70)万元和东北地区0.54(0.29)万元,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);“双一流”院校生均支出3.32(1.53)万元高于非“双一流”院校的1.16(1.00)万元,其差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 我国医学院校本科教学经费总量增长而生均支出下降,支出结构高度集中于教学日常运行与专项经费,生均经费在地区和院校类别之间存在差异。

本文引用格式

宋岩 , 靳岩鹏 , 王思璠 , 刘佳楠 , 段严寒 , 陈皓阳 , 吴海江 . 我国56所高等医学院校2019至2022学年本科教学经费的支出规模与结构分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025 , 45(11) : 801 -805 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20241106-01154

Abstract

Objective To analyze the expenditure of undergraduate teaching funds in China's medical universities. The aim is to provide a basis for the management of undergraduate teaching funds in medical schools. Methods Textual data analysis was conducted, the data from the Undergraduate Teaching Quality Reports published by 56 Chinese medical universities between the academic years of 2019 and 2022. A descriptive statistical analysis and nonparametric rank-sum test were applied for the purpose of comparing the scale and structure of undergraduate teaching expenditure across a range of different regions, institutional affiliations, and university tiers. Results From 2019 to 2022 academic year, the total undergraduate teaching expenditure across the 56 medical institutions increased from 5.888 billion yuan to 6.402 billion yuan. However, per-student expenditure decline from 16.8 thousand yuan to 15.5 thousand yuan. In terms of expenditure structure, it is evident that in the 2021-2022 academic year, the per-student routine teaching operational expenditures amounted to 6.4 thousand yuan, while the per-student specialized undergraduate teaching funding reached 7.4 thousand yuan. The per capita expenditure in the 2021-2022 academic year, in descending order of regions, was 21.4 (15.9) thousand yuan in the eastern region, 11.4 (8.1) thousand yuan in the western region, 9.4 (7.0) thousand yuan in the central region, and 5.4 (2.9) thousand yuan in the northeast region, with statistical differences (P<0.05). The per capita expenditure of ″Double First-Class″ universities was 33.2 (15.3) thousand yuan, which was higher than that of non-″Double First-Class″ universities of 11.6 (10.0) thousand yuan, with statistical differences (P<0.05). Conclusions Despite an overall increase in undergraduate teaching funding for medical institutions in China, per-student expenditure has decreased. The expenditure structure remains highly concentrated in routine teaching operations and special-purpose funds, with per-student funding exhibiting regional and institutional disparities.

参考文献

[1] Ahmad AR, Farley A, Naidoo M. Impact of the government funding reforms on the teaching and learning of Malaysian public universities[J]. High Educ Stud,2012,2(2):114-124. DOI:10.5539/hes.v2n2p114.
[2] Munoz DA. Assessing the research efficiency of higher education institutions in Chile: a data envelopment analysis approach[J]. Int J Educ Manag,2016,30(6):809-825.DOI:10.1108/IJEM-03-2015-0022.
[3] 潘玉会.民办综合类高校教学经费支出研究——基于山东省10所民办综合类高校2018—2022年本科教学质量报告的分析[J].经济研究导刊,2024(16):88-92.
[4] 杨过,吴家媛,易兰,等.本科教学评估推动遵义医科大学高质量发展[J].浙江医学教育,2023,22(5):257-266.DOI:10.20019/j.cnki.1672-0024.2023.05.257.10.
[5] 毛建青,刘美佳,陈文博.我国一流大学本科教学经费的支出规模与结构研究——基于39所世界一流大学建设高校《本科教学质量报告》的分析[J].高校教育管理,2021,15(6):33-47. DOI:10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20211013.004.
[6] Wang XJ, Chang A. Sustainable higher education policy: the strategic implication of Taiwan's SPROUT project and fiscal sustainability[J]. Sustainability-Basel,2025,17(19):8769.HYPERLINK "https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198769" DOI:10.3390/su17198769.
[7] 漆艳春.地方医学院校本科教学质量分析与思考——基于16所院校年度《本科教学质量报告》[J].西部素质教育,2023,9(4):25-28.DOI:10.16681/j.cnki.wcqe.202304007.
[8] 刘长妹.高校师范类本科专业教学与实践经费预算管理的问题及对策——以江西省为例[J].南昌师范学院学报,2021,42(6):69-72.
[9] Kudła J, Stachowiak-Kudła M, Figurski A. Quality of teaching and research in public higher education in Poland: relationship with financial indicators and effciency[J]. J Man Bus Adm-Cen Eu,2017,24(4):88-108. DOI:10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.184.
[10] 麻丽丽.医学专业教育中实践教学重要性以及现存问题探讨[J].中国电力教育,2012(34):104-105. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-0079.2012.34.055.
[11] 陈俊香, 王丹, 陶立坚. 医学人才培养之院校教育特色实践[J].中国卫生人才,2023(2):22-24.
[12] 文镇宋,张明奎.高校附属医院人才培养探索与实践——清华大学第一附属医院为例[J].中国研究型医院,2021,8(5):12-15.DOI:10.19450/j.cnki.jcrh.2021.05.003.
[13] 周光礼.构建中国特色高等教育体系:国家战略视角[J].中国高教研究,2020(7):5-13. DOI:10.16298/j.cnki.1004-3667.2020.07.02.
[14] 谯利平, 唐智松. 临床教学基地参与医教协同育人动力机制研究[J].医学与哲学,2025,46(7):1-5,37. DOI:10.12014/j.issn.1002-0772.2025.07.01.
[15] 陈映虹,王静,谈晓红.院校合作模式下医院志愿服务的探索与实践[J].现代商贸工业,2024,45(4):88-90.DOI:10.19311/j.cnki.1672-3198.2024.04.028.
[16] Jacobs E. The homogenizing and diversifying effects of migration policy in the internationalization of higher education[J]. High Educ,2020,83(2):1-17. DOI:10.1007/s10734-020-00658-4.
[17] 陈兴德. 趋同存异:保持高等教育的多样性[J].高等教育研究,2022,43(3):43-52.
[18] 景智雄.强化党建引领深化教育改革全面提升区域内学校教育质量和办学水平[J].陕西教育(综合版),2025(10):32-34.
[19] 程庆梅,张晓蕾.运用信息化平台开展职业院校东西协作教师教研的研究——以Hlearning网络云平台开展教师教研为例[J].工业和信息化教育,2025(6):81-85.
[20] 杨慧, 池涌, 葛富林, 等. 东西协作、产教融合、精准脱贫:西部山区高职院校人才培养模式研究[J].中国职业技术教育,2023(27):42-46.
文章导航

/