教学方法

概念图在临床医学概要课程教学中的应用研究

  • 丁燕 ,
  • 刘灵丽 ,
  • 陈月富 ,
  • 曹湘玉 ,
  • 金玲 ,
  • 黄民江
展开
  • 湖南医药学院诊断学教研室,怀化 418000

收稿日期: 2023-12-30

  网络出版日期: 2025-03-31

基金资助

2023年湖南省普通高等学校教学改革研究重点项目(HNJG-20231499)

Application of concept maps in the curriculum delivery of clinical medicine summary

  • Ding Yan ,
  • Liu Lingli ,
  • Chen Yuefu ,
  • Cao Xiangyu ,
  • Jin Ling ,
  • Huang Minjiang
Expand
  • Department of Diagnosis, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua 418000, China

Received date: 2023-12-30

  Online published: 2025-03-31

Supported by

Key Project of Teaching Reform Research in General Higher Education Institutions of Hunan Province in 2023 (HNJG-20231499)

摘要

目的 探讨概念图应用于临床医学概要课程教学的效果。方法 采用试验对照方法,2023年3至6月,选取湖南医药学院2021级四年制医学影像技术专业4个班120名学生为研究对象。通过抽签将其中2个班60名学生设为试验组,另2个班60名学生设为对照组。在临床医学概要课程教学中,试验组学生融入概念图教学,对照组学生采用传统教学方法。教学结束后,评价试验组学生概念图绘制水平,统计试验组学生对概念图应用的评价,比较两组学生平时成绩和期末考试成绩差异以及对教学方式的满意度,组间比较采用独立样本t检验和χ2检验。结果 试验组学生在未引入概念图授课前第一次绘制的概念图评分(78.62±4.77)分,引入概念图授课后3次绘制的概念图评分依次为(89.70±5.03)分、(90.97±4.29)分、(91.27±3.68)分,均高于第一次,且差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。试验组学生平时成绩为(36.07±1.94)分,明显高于对照组学生的(33.93±1.96)分,试验组学生期末考试成绩为(50.35±3.78)分,明显高于对照组学生的(46.63±4.27)分;试验组学生对课程学习主动性的评分为(3.68±1.30)分,高于对照组学生的(3.03±1.77)分;试验组学生对教学满意度的评分为(3.77±1.21)分,高于对照组学生的(2.98±1.94)分;以上差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 概念图在临床医学概要课程教学中的应用,有助于学生掌握概念图的绘制,促进学生主动学习,提高学生对教学的满意度,并促进教学效果的提升。

本文引用格式

丁燕 , 刘灵丽 , 陈月富 , 曹湘玉 , 金玲 , 黄民江 . 概念图在临床医学概要课程教学中的应用研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025 , 45(4) : 293 -297 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20231230-00642

Abstract

Objective To explore the effectiveness of concept maps in the curriculum delivery of clinical medicine summary. Methods A controlled experimental design was employed. Between March and June 2023,four classes of 120 students from the 2021 cohort of the four-year medical imaging technology program at Hunan University of Medicine were enrolled as research subject, two classes of 60 students were enrolled as the experimental group, while another two classes of 60 students served as the control group by drawing lots. In the clinical medicine summary course, students in the experimental group were taught using concept maps, whereas the control group received traditional teaching methods. After the course, the concept map drawing abilities of the experimental group were evaluated, and the evaluations on the application of concept maps of the experimental group were collected, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of regular grades and final exam scores and teaching satisfaction. Statistical analyses were performed using independent sample t-tests and χ2 tests. Results The concept map scores of the experimental group before the introduction of concept maps were (78.62±4.77) points. After the concept map-based instruction, their scores on subsequent concept maps were (89.70±5.03), (90.97±4.29), and (91.27±3.68), which were all higher than the initial score (all P<0.05). The regular grade of the experimental group were (36.07±1.94), which were higher than those of the control group (33.93±1.96). The final exam scores of the experimental group were (50.35±3.78), which were higher than those of the control group (46.63±4.27). The experimental group rated their learning initiative as (3.68±1.30), higher than the control group's score of (3.03±1.77). The experimental group also rated their teaching satisfaction as (3.77±1.21), higher than the control group's rating of (2.98±1.94), with all statistical differences (all P<0.05). Conclusions The use of concept maps in the clinical medicine summary course helps students master concept map drawing, promotes active learning, increases student satisfaction with teaching, and enhances overall teaching effectiveness.

参考文献

[1] 李丽娟, 王丽, 闫燕. 概念图在医学教育中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(12):1098-1101. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220509-00599.
[2] 丁善菊, 孔丽丽, 商丽, 等. 以自主学习能力为导向的概念图教学模式在高职护理人体形态学教学中的应用[J]. 解剖学杂志,2022,45(2):193-196. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1633.2022.02.030.
[3] Chuechote S , Laosinchai P .Utilizing graphical elements for concept map analysis to design teaching and learning assessment[J]. Int J Inform Educat Technol, 2020, 10(8):557-562.DOI:10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.8.1424.
[4] 祖莉, 李园园, 崔英健, 等. 概念图和3D-Body解剖模型在护理解剖学教学中的应用[J]. 安徽医专学报,2022,21(2):126-128. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0196.2022.02.046.
[5] 张静, 王晶心, 王蕾, 等. 案例分析联合概念构图教学法在中医护理教学中的应用效果[J]. 中国继续医学教育,2023,15(14):106-111. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2023.14.025.
[6] 梅希, 曾俊, 黎瑶. 《临床医学概要》课程教学的设计及实践[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志,2021,20(7):776-778. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200313-00542.
[7] 王丽亚, 张晓晨, 孙晓妍, 等. 课程思政融入康复治疗技术专业教学中的实践与探索[J]. 中国当代医药,2024,31(13):114-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4721.2024.13.028.
[8] 杨琨. 新医科背景下《临床医学概要》课程改革与建设——以药学专业为例[J]. 产业与科技论坛,2024,23(10):185-187.
[9] 李雪, 赵宇, 耿晓波, 等. “临床医学概要”课程在线教学运用参与式学习的研究与实践[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2021,42(13):1158-1161. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1256.2021.13.16.
[10] 李瑞, 徐旸, 张琳, 等. 概念构图教学法对护理本科学生临床评判性思维能力的影响[J]. 护理实践与研究,2021,18(18):2813-2818. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9676.2021.18.033.
[11] Brondfield S, Seol A, Hyland K, et al. Integrating concept maps into a medical student oncology curriculum[J]. J Cancer Educ, 2021,36(1):85-91. DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-01601-7.
[12] 段俗言, 邢昌赢, 张波. 案例式教学法联合概念图在肾脏内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用[J]. 中国毕业后医学教育,2021,5(5):451-454. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2021.05.016.
[13] 刘柳, 黄新, 怡萍. 基于概念图的团队合作学习在本科护生急诊实习中的应用[J]. 解放军护理杂志,2022,39(5):84-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2022.05.021.
[14] 牛小梅, 喻斌, 李健, 等. 概念图结合TBL对护理实习生考核成绩、评判性思维能力及教学满意度的影响[J]. 中华医学教育探索杂志,2022,21(1):106-109. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn116021-20200102-00743.
[15] 周太梅, 王海英, 江兴林, 等. 案例教学法结合概念图在生物化学与分子生物学课程中的应用研究[J]. 中国高等医学教育,2024(3):67-69. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2024.03.026.
文章导航

/