教学方法

基于问题学习结合医学模拟教学方法在住院医师创面修复教学中的应用

  • 雷永红 ,
  • 王认 ,
  • 张李婧 ,
  • 陈犹白 ,
  • 舒军 ,
  • 李雪
展开
  • 1解放军总医院第一医学中心整形修复科,北京 100853;
    2内蒙古国际蒙医医院肛肠科,呼和浩特 010020;
    3辽宁中医药大学杏林学院2020级5年制中医系中医学专业学生,沈阳 110016;
    4南方医科大学深圳医院心血管内科,深圳 518101
雷永红和王认对本文有同等贡献

收稿日期: 2024-05-09

  网络出版日期: 2025-01-25

The application of simulated medicine combined with problem-based learning to improve the teaching effects of standardized residency training for wound repair

  • Lei Yonghong ,
  • Wang Ren ,
  • Zhang Lijing ,
  • Chen Youbai ,
  • Shu Jun ,
  • Li Xue
Expand
  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, General Hospital of Chinese PLA, Beijing 100853, China;
    2Department of Proctology, International Mongolian Hospital of Inner Mongolia, Huhehaote 010020, China;
    3Liaoning University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Xinglin College, Shenyang 110016, China;
    4Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen Hospital of Southern Medical Universit, Shenzhen 518101, China
Lei Yonghong and Wang Ren contributed equally to this work

Received date: 2024-05-09

  Online published: 2025-01-25

摘要

目的 探讨基于问题学习(problem-based learning,PBL)结合基于人体模型的医学模拟教学在住院医师创面修复教学中的应用效果。 方法 本研究采用试验对照方法。2022年1至12月,以解放军总医院第一医学中心接受住院医师规范化培训的60名学员为研究对象,采用随机数字表法将其平均分为试验组和对照组。试验组学员采用PBL结合基于人体模型的医学模拟教学方法,对照组学员采用传统课堂讲授结合基于人体模型的医学模拟教学方法。在为期2个月的创面修复教学结束后,通过两组学员考核成绩和问卷调查结果评价各自教学效果,采用χ2检验和t检验分析相关数据。 结果 两组学员应用皮瓣修复创面的理论考试成绩比较,其差异无统计学意义[(88.3±5.1)分比(87.9±4.7)分,P=0.726];试验组学员的实践考试成绩高于对照组学员,其差异具有统计学意义[(92.6±5.1)分比(80.4±6.2)分,P=0.012]。问卷调查结果显示,PBL结合基于人体模型的医学模拟教学在激发学员的学习兴趣,提高其自学能力、皮瓣设计的临床应用能力和创新能力培养等方面,试验组学员赞成的比例均高于对照组学员[86.7%(26/30)比60.0%(18/30),90.0%(27/30)比50.0%(15/30),96.7%(29/30)比63.3%(19/30),90.0%(27/30)比50.0%(15/30)],其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。 结论 PBL结合基于人体模型的医学模拟教学有助于提高学员在短时间内应用皮瓣的临床实践能力,并得到住培学员的认可,实现了迅速提高学员应用皮瓣修复创面能力的培养目标。

本文引用格式

雷永红 , 王认 , 张李婧 , 陈犹白 , 舒军 , 李雪 . 基于问题学习结合医学模拟教学方法在住院医师创面修复教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2025 , 45(2) : 125 -129 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20240509-00468

Abstract

Objective To explore the effect of applying problem-based learning (PBL) combined with medical simulation teaching based on human models in the teaching of wound repair for resident physicians. Methods The experimental control method was used. From January to December 2022, 60 trainees undergoing standardized residency training at the First Medical Center of the People′s Liberation Army General Hospital were enrolled. They were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group using a random number table method. The experimental group used PBL combined with simulation teaching method based on human body model, while the control group used traditional teaching combined with simulation teaching method based on human body model. After a 2-month wound repair teaching, the teaching effectiveness was evaluated based on assessment scores and questionnaire survey results, and relevant data was analyzed using a chi square test and t-test. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the theoretical exam scores of the two groups of trainees using skin flaps to repair wounds [(88.3 ± 5.1) vs. (87.9 ± 4.7), P=0.726]. The practical exam scores of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant [(92.6 ± 5.1) vs. (80.4 ± 6.2), P=0.012]. The results of the questionnaire survey showed that the combination of PBL and simulation teaching based on human models was able to stimulate trainees′ learning interest, improve their self-learning ability, enhance their clinical application ability of skin flap design, master clinical skills, and cultivate innovation ability. The proportion of trainees in the experimental group who agree with it were higher than those of the control group [86.7% (26/30) vs.60.0% (18/30),90.0% (27/30 ) vs.50.0% (15/30),96.7% (29/30) vs.63.3% (19/30),90.0% (27/30) vs.50.0% (15/30) ], and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions The combination of PBL and medical simulation teaching based on human models helped improve the clinical practice ability of students to apply skin flaps in a short period of time, and was recognized by resident trainees, achieving the training goal of rapidly improving students′ ability to use skin flaps to repair wounds.

参考文献

[1] 颜勇卿,葛志斌,胡素佩.住院医师和带教教师对住院医师规范化培训评价的比较[J].中华医学教育杂志, 2021,41(10): 941-945. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20201224-01760.
[2]Gao J, Yang L, Zhao J, et al. Comparison of problem-based learning and traditional teaching methods in medical psychology education in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. PLoS One,2020,15(12): e0243897-0243905.DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0243897. eCollection 2020.
[3]Kim K, Kim J, Jeong W, et al. Outcome of distal lower leg reconstruction with the propellerperforator flap in diabetic patients[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2021,55(4):242-248. DOI:10.1080/2000656X.2020.1858843.
[4]Rini IS, Gunardi AJ, Marsaulina RP, et al. A systematic review of the keystone design perforator island flap in the reconstruction of trunk defects[J]. Arch Plast Surg, 2020,47(6):535-541. DOI:10.5999/aps.2020.00094.
[5]董榕, 寻庆英, 石丽娟, 等. 构建以培养能力为核心的研究性实验教学体系的探索[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2010,30(4): 610-611,634. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2010.04.049.
[6]张慧, 张劲松, 陈旭锋, 等. 多学科协作联合情景模拟教学法在急诊体外心肺复苏培训中的应用[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2021,30(10): 1274-1276. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2021.10.022.
[7]田红, 李颖, 杨梓含, 等. 基于问题学习结合情景模拟教学在消毒供应中心护士岗位胜任能力培养中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023,43(2): 136-139. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220606-00734.
[8]岑超群, 张柯, 吴健珍, 等. 基于以结果为导向教育的混合式教学方式在急诊医学见习教学中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021,41(11): 1008-1011. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210304-00296.
[9]Harriel KL, Parboosingh JT. Improving pediatric problem-based learning sessions in undergraduate and graduate medical education[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2020,32(6): 832-836. DOI:10.1097/MOP.0000000000000962.
[10]Azer SA, Guerrero AP, Walsh A. Enhancing learning approaches: practical tips for students and teachers[J]. Med Teach, 2013,35(6): 433-443. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2013.775413.
[11]Hepps JH, Yu CE, Calaman S. Simulation in medical education for the hospitalist: moving beyond the mock code[J]. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2019,66(4): 855-866. DOI: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.014.
文章导航

/