目的 探讨混合式教学模式在复训学员基础生命支持培训中的应用效果。方法 采用试验对照方法。选取同济大学附属东方医院参加基础生命支持培训的522名复训学员为本研究对象,所有学员均为院内医师。2023年3至4月参加复训的265名学员设为试验组,采用混合教学模式; 2021年3至4月参加复训的257名学员设为对照组,采用传统教学模式。通过两组学员的技能考核和对试验组学员的问卷调查评价教学效果。采用χ2检验、t检验进行数据分析。结果 试验组学员的技能考核首次通过率高于对照组学员[90.6%(240/265)比84.4%(217/257)],其差异具有统计学意义(P=0.034)。试验组学员对采用混合式教学模式进行复训的喜爱度评分为(4.73±0.64)分,接受课程后在实践中使用基础生命支持的信心度评分为(4.78±0.62)分。96.6%(256/265)的学员认为采用混合式教学模式有助于更加灵活地学习,95.5%(253/265)的学员认为有助于系统掌握基础生命支持知识和技能。结论 混合式教学模式有助于提高复训学员在基础生命支持培训中的技能测试通过率,具有让学员更加灵活地进行学习、系统掌握知识和技能的优势,受到学员的喜爱,提高了学员运用基础生命支持技能的自信心。
马若琳
,
顾浩杰
,
刘圣珺
,
单启源
,
陈迟
,
孙晓靓
,
康宝丽
,
徐玮
,
丁敏
. 混合式教学模式在复训学员基础生命支持培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024
, 44(8)
: 611
-614
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230804-00088
Objective To explore the application effects of blended learning inbasic life support training for retraining trainees. Methods An experimental control method was used. A total of522 retraining trainees from East Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University who participated in the basic life support training were selected as the subjects, all of whom were hospital physicians. 265 retraining trainees who participated in the training from March to April 2023 were set as the experimental group, using blended learning mode; and 257 retraining trainees who participated in the training from March to April 2021 were set as the control groupusing blended learning mode. The teaching effectiveness were evaluated through the skill assessments of two groups of trainees and a questionnaire survey of trainees participating in blended learning mode. χ2-test and t-test were used for data analysis. Results The first-time pass rate of skill assessment among the experimental group trainees was higher than that of the control group trainees [90.6% (240/265) vs. 84.4% (217/257)](P=0.034). The survey results showed that the average score of the experimental group's liking for using blended learning mode for retraining was (4.73±0.64) points, and the average score of confidence in using basic life support in practice after receiving the course was (4.78±0.62) points. In addition, 96.6% (256/265) of the experimental group believed that adopting a blended teaching mode would facilitate more flexible learning, while 95.5% (253/265) believed that it would help to systematically master basic life support knowledge and skills. Conclusions The blended learning mode helps to improve the retraining trainees' pass rate of skills assessments in the training of basic life support. It has the advantage of allowing students to learn more flexibly and systematically to master knowledge and skills, and to enhances their confidence in using basic life support skills.
[1] Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care[J]. Circulation, 2020,142(16suppl2):S337-S357. DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000918.
[2] 马红梅, 陈湘玉, 文秀, 等. 高质量心肺复苏培训对提高医务人员基础生命支持精准性的效果评价[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2019,14(5):415-418. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2019.05.006.
[3] 郑康, 李辉, 马青变. 借鉴美国心脏协会基础生命支持课程推进我国医务人员的心肺复苏培训[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(11):1046-1049. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210513-00633.
[4] 李崎, 林静, 刘进, 等. 集体反馈方法对医学生基本生命支持技能学习的影响[J].中华医学教育杂志,2012,32(6):909-911,931. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2012.06.035.
[5] Ko YC, Lin HY, Chiang WC, et al. Comparing the effects of blended learning and traditional instruction on basic life support for laypersons: a randomized controlled trial[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2023,S0929-6646(23):435-437. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.10.017.
[6] Abuejheisheh AJ, Alshraideh JA, Amro N, et al. Effectiveness of blended learning basic life support module on knowledge and skills: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Heliyon, 2023,9(11):e21680. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21680.
[7] 苏成磊, 陈可, 仲轶, 等. 线上线下混合模式在本科生心肺复苏教学中的效果评价[J].中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志,2023,18(2):261-263. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6966.2023.02.031.
[8] 高连娣, 高思杰, 袁旭, 等. 基于信息化培训平台的视频教学方式在提高新入职护士心肺复苏质量中的效果评价[J].中国实用护理杂志,2021,37(33):2617-2622. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn211501-20200928-04036.
