目的 分析北京市4家住院医师规范化培训(简称住培)基地住院医师结业考核结果及其相关因素,为培训质量同质化提供参考。方法 2023年9月至11月,选取2018至2022年进入4家住培基地的临床医学专业和口腔全科专业的1 007名住院医师为研究对象,收集其基本信息及年度业务水平测试结果,通过χ2检验、logistic回归、ROC曲线等方法分析结业考核结果及其相关因素。结果 1 007名住院医师中,首次结业考核通过的人数为864名(85.8%),其中理论考核和临床实践能力考核通过的人数分别为915名(90.9%)、949名(94.2%)。logistic回归分析结果显示,外科(OR=3.92,95%CI:1.77~8.68)、内科和神经内科(OR=3.54,95%CI:1.77~7.06)、医学影像科(OR=3.64,95%CI:1.69~7.85)住院医师的结业考核通过率低于其他专业,博士研究生结业考核通过率高于本科毕业生(OR=0.35,95%CI:0.20~0.63),年度业务水平测试全国百分位数越大结业考核通过率越高(OR=0.96,95%CI:0.96~0.98)。结论 住院医师结业考核通过率不高,学历、专业和年度业务水平测试全国百分位数是结业考核通过率的主要相关因素。各基地应当根据住院医师个体特征制定培训方案,以达到同质化培养要求。
王娜
,
刘磊
,
陈丽芬
,
朱光艺
,
常丹
,
谢姿
,
关雷
,
台卫平
,
张永明
. 北京市住院医师规范化培训结业考核结果分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024
, 44(7)
: 541
-545
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20231120-00504
Objective To analyze the final assessment results and related factors of standardized residency training in four training bases in Beijing and to propose suggestions for future improvement. Methods From September to November 2023, the final assessment results of 1007 resident physicians in clinical medicine and dentistry who entered the 4 training bases from 2018 to 2022 were enrolled. Basic information and results of proficiency tests, the final assessment results and related factors were collected and analyzed using methods such as χ2 test, logistic regression, and ROC curve. Results From 2020 to 2023, 864(85.8%) of the 1007 residents passed the final assessment for the first time, of which 915(90.9%) and 949(94.2%) passed the knowledge assessment and the practice assessment, respectively. Logistic regression analysis results show that the final examination pass rates for the surgery major(OR=3.92, 95% CI: 1.77~8.68), internal medicine and neurology major(OR=3.54, 95% CI: 1.77~7.06), and medical imaging major(OR=3.64, 95% CI: 1.69~7.85)were lower than those for “other” majors. Doctoral graduate students(OR=0.35, 95% CI: 0.20~0.63) have a higher final examination pass rate than undergraduate students. The higher the national percentile score in the annual clinic competency test (OR=0.96, 95% CI: 0.96~0.98), the higher the final examination pass rate. Conclusions The pass rate of final assessment in standardized residency training in our study was not high, the related factors were educational background, training major, and the national percentile of the annual clinic competency test. Residency training bases should develop training programs based on the individual characteristics of resident physicians to meet the requirements for standardized training.
[1] 中国住院医师培训精英教学医院联盟. 中国住院医师培训精英教学医院联盟住院医师核心胜任力框架共识[J].协和医学杂志,2022,13(1):17-23. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2021-0755.
[2] 国家卫生计生委. 国家卫生计生委关于印发住院医师规范化培训管理办法(试行)的通知[EB/OL].[2014-08-26].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/qjjys/s3593/201408/6281beb3830c42c4a0d2319a2668050e.shtml
[3] 龚晓蓉, 何兆初, 陈小燕, 等. 内科住培医师年度业务水平测试与结业考核结果相关性分析[J].中国继续医学教育,2022,14(6):113-116. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2022.06.030.
[4] 曹倩, 许淼, 郭光昕, 等. 上海市住院医师规范化培训结业综合考核通过率及其影响因素[J].中国卫生资源,2021,24(6):748-755. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-953X.2021.06.025.
[5] 北京市卫生健康委员会. 关于公布北京地区2023年住院医师规范化培训结业考核结果的通知[EB/OL]. [2023-06-27].https://wjw.beijing.gov.cn/zwgk_20040/tzgg/202306/t20230627_3147496.html.
[6] 张培,唐大龙,冯湘雨,等.结果同质化目标下江苏省外科住培结业理论考核成绩分析[J].江苏卫生事业管理,2020,31(10):1364-1367.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-7803.2020.10.034.
[7] 张钰鹏, 王亚军, 陈丽芬, 等. 学历对外科住院医师规范化培训临床技能结业考核结果影响的探讨[J].中华医学教育杂志,2020,40(2):127-130. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.02.012.
[8] 张丹丹, 金镇, 常青, 等. 2020年辽宁省妇产科住院医师规范化培训结业实践技能考核结果分析[J].中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(11):1021-1025. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210303-00279.
[9] 陈婉玲, 陈小燕. 不同来源规培医师结业理论考核的结果分析[J].中国高等医学教育,2018(2):24-25. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1701.2018.02.012.
[10] 赵宁, 李俊, 李亚东, 等. 外科住院医师规范化培训结业考试单中心成绩分析[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(1):65-68.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.01.013.
[11] 王芳, 张红霞, 杜丽娟, 等. 超声医学操作技能"标准化过程考核"教学模式探讨[J].中国继续医学教育,2023,15(18):183-186. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2023.18.042.
[12] 艾慧俊, 周利芬, 戴丽雅, 等. 分级进阶式以图导学在住院医师心脏超声教学中的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2023,43(7):534-538. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220831-01100.
[13] 曾庆奇, 王建六, 刘婧, 等. 北京市住院医师规范化培训年度业务水平测试成绩与结业考核成绩的关联性研究[J].中华医学教育杂志,2022,42(6):558-562. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220119-00076.