医学教育管理

临床医学专业非中国大陆学生与中国大陆学生的学情比较

  • 潘三强 ,
  • 李洪英 ,
  • 武凤鸣 ,
  • 李雁雪
展开
  • 1暨南大学基础医学与公共卫生学院人体解剖学系,广州 510632;
    2暨南大学基础医学与公共卫生学院中心实验室,广州 510632;
    3暨南大学基础医学与公共卫生学院学生科,广州 510632

收稿日期: 2023-09-26

  网络出版日期: 2024-07-02

基金资助

暨南大学教学质量与教学改革工程项目(JG2022051)

Comparison of student engagement between non-mainland and mainland medical students

  • Pan Sanqiang ,
  • Li Hongying ,
  • Wu Fengming ,
  • Li Yanxue
Expand
  • 1Department of Anatomy, School of Basic Medicine and Public Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
    2Central Laboratory, School of Basic Medicine and Public Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China;
    3Office of Student Affairs, School of Basic Medicine and Public Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China

Received date: 2023-09-26

  Online published: 2024-07-02

Supported by

Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project of Jinan University (JG2022051)

摘要

目的 比较临床医学专业非中国大陆学生与中国大陆学生的学情差异,为促进非中国大陆学生成长提供参考。方法 采用中国大学生学习性投入调查问卷,在2022年11月至2022年12月期间调查暨南大学临床医学专业非中国大陆学生与中国大陆学生的学习情况,对两类学生的学情数据进行统计分析,并通过t检验确认两组学生间差异。结果 临床医学专业非中国大陆学生学业挑战度评分[(477.88±134.64)分]低于中国大陆学生[(547.79±121.96)分],校园环境支持度评分[(489.02±119.82)分]低于中国大陆学生[(538.12±131.60)分],其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。非中国大陆学生比中国大陆学生在主动合作学习水平[(293.90±101.83)比(287.65±107.76)]、生师互动[(264.26±166.51)比(258.80±176.20)]和教育经验丰富度[(718.29±200.13)比(707.59±194.23)]3个方面,两类学生评分相比,其差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论 非中国大陆学生的学业挑战度和校园环境支持度评分低于中国大陆学生,需要加强非中国大陆学生的学业要求,提高满意度,以便促进他们的学业进步,使其获得更好的成长。

本文引用格式

潘三强 , 李洪英 , 武凤鸣 , 李雁雪 . 临床医学专业非中国大陆学生与中国大陆学生的学情比较[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024 , 44(7) : 492 -496 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2020.04.000

Abstract

Objective To compare the differences of student engagement between non-mainland students and mainland medical students, so as to inform future improvement of non-mainland students' academic development. Methods The China national survey of student engagement was used to evaluate the non-mainland and mainland medical students at Jinan University from November 2022 to December 2022. Results The level of academic challenge of non-mainland medical students (477.88±134.64) was significantly lower than that of mainland students (547.79±121.96). The total scores of the supportive campus environment of non-mainland students (489.02±119.82) were also significantly lower than those of mainland students (538.12±131.60)(all P<0.001). In terms of active cooperative learning level [(293.90±101.83) vs.(287.65±107.76)], student teacher interaction [(264.26±166.51) vs. (258.80±176.20)], and educational experience richness [(718.29±200.13) vs. (707.59±194.23)], there was no statistically significant difference in total scores between the two types of students (all P>0.05). Conclusions The levels of academic challenge and supportive campus environment for non-mainland students were lower than those of mailand students. It is necessary to strength the academic requirements of nan-mailand students, and improve their satisfaction, so as to promote their academic development and achieve better growth.

参考文献

[1] 王小青, 牛彤琰. 20余年来美国NSSE项目的发展及其对中国大学生学情调查的影响[J].高等教育研究,2022,43(12):87-100.
[2] 黄雨恒,史静寰.美国高等教育普及化阶段“以学生为中心”的教学改革成效探析—基于“全美大学生学习性投入调查(NSSE)”[J].教育学报,2024,20(2):150-164.
[3] 史静寰, 涂冬波, 王纾, 等. 基于学习过程的本科教育学情调查报告2009[J].清华大学教育研究,2011,32(4):9-23. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4519.2011.04.002.
[4] 黄美娟. 美国“全国大学生学习性投入调查”(NSSE)研究[D]. 上海:上海师范大学,2014.
[5] 涂冬波,史静寰,郭芳芳.中国大学生学习性投入调查问卷的测量学研究.复旦教育论坛,2013,11(1):55-62.DOI: 10.13397/j.cnki.fef.2013.01.012.
[6] 文雯,,史静寰,周子矜.大四现象:一种学习方式的转型-清华大学本科教育学情调查报告2013[J]. 清华大学教育研究,2014,35(3):45-54. DOI:10.14138/j.1001-4519.2014.03.021.
[7] 孟倩, 许晓东, 贾文秀. 院校环境支持对大学生学习收获的影响研究——基于变化评定模型的链式中介[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2022(2):132-141.
文章导航

/