医学教育评估

全国中医药经典能力等级考试满意度影响因素及其相互关系研究

  • 杨蕊宁 ,
  • 焦楠 ,
  • 袁娜 ,
  • 胡鑫悦 ,
  • 纪刘岩 ,
  • 霍海鸿 ,
  • 谷晓红
展开
  • 1北京中医药大学2022级公共管理专业硕士研究生,北京 102488;
    2北京中医药大学国家中医药高等教育研究院,北京 102488;
    3北京中医药大学2021级公共管理专业硕士研究生,北京 102488

收稿日期: 2023-07-13

  网络出版日期: 2024-05-30

Influencing factors of the satisfaction of the National Traditional Chinese Medicine Classics Proficiency Level Examination and their internal relationship

  • Yang Ruining ,
  • Jiao Nan ,
  • Yuan Na ,
  • Hu Xinyue ,
  • Ji Liuyan ,
  • Huo Haihong ,
  • Gu Xiaohong
Expand
  • 1Master Degree Candidate,Public Administration, Enrolled in 2018,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488;
    2National Institute of Higher Education in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China;
    3Master Degree Candidate, Public Administration, Enrolled in 2021, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 102488, China

Received date: 2023-07-13

  Online published: 2024-05-30

摘要

目的 探讨全国中医药经典能力等级考试(简称考试)满意度影响因素及其相互之间的关系,为考试改革与中医药人才培养提供参考与建议。方法 本研究采用问卷调查法,于2022年8月,对全国40所医学院校参加考试的3 369名学生进行问卷调查,内容包括对考试4个维度(知识、实践、价值观、考核)和满意度共19个条目的评价。并对调查结果进行描述性统计分析和结构方程模型构建。结果 学生对考试知识维度评分为(15.66±3.64)分,实践维度评分为(15.69±3.63)分,价值观维度评分为(20.61±4.45)分,考核维度评分为(11.25±2.50)分,满意度评分为(11.99±2.57)分(满分15分)。学生对实践、价值观、考核维度与满意度评分呈正相关(β=0.353、0.432、0.190,均P<0.001);学生对实践与价值观、考核维度评分呈正相关(β=0.470、0.732,P<0.001);学生对考核与价值观维度评分呈正相关(β=0.420,P<0.001);学生对知识与实践维度评分呈正相关(β=0.979,P<0.001)。结论 学生对考试满意度较高。学生对实践和考核维度评价越高,对于考试的满意度越高。建议分阶段培养学生的能力,并持续完善全国中医药经典能力等级考试建设,提升考试质量。

本文引用格式

杨蕊宁 , 焦楠 , 袁娜 , 胡鑫悦 , 纪刘岩 , 霍海鸿 , 谷晓红 . 全国中医药经典能力等级考试满意度影响因素及其相互关系研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024 , 44(6) : 458 -461 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230713-00687

Abstract

Objective To explore the influencing factors of the satisfaction of the national traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) classics proficiency level examination and the internal relationships among them, so as to inform the examination reform and the training of TCM practitioners. Methods In this study, the questionnaire method was used and a self-designed questionnaire with 19 entries in 4 dimensions (knowledge, practice, values, appraisal) and satisfaction was used. The questionnaire was administered to 3 369 students who took the examination in 40 medical schools across the country in august 2022, and the results were analyzed with descriptive statistics and structural equation modeling. Results Students scored (15.66±3.64) points for students' knowledge dimension, (15.69±3.63) points for practice dimension, (20.61±4.45) points for value dimension, and (11.25±2.50) points for appraisal dimension. The satisfaction score was (11.99±2.57). The score of practice, value and appraisal dimension had positive effects on satisfaction score (β=0.353, 0.432, 0.190, P<0.001). The score of practice dimension had positive effects on the value dimension and test paper quality dimension (β=0.470, 0.732, P<0.001). “appraisal” dimension score had positive effects on students' value dimension scores (β=0.420, P<0.001). The score of students' knowledge dimension had a positive effect on the score of practice dimension (β=0.979, P<0.001). Conclusions Students have high satisfaction with exams. The stronger the students' practical ability and the higher their evaluation of the examination, the higher their satisfaction with the examination. It is recommended to cultivate students' ability in stages and continuously improve the construction of the national traditional Chinese medicine classics proficiency level examination to enhance the quality of the examination.

参考文献

[1] 吴莎, 郑宏山. 大学英语四六级考试满意度调查——基于结构方程模型的实证分析[J].中国考试,2020(4):55-64. DOI: 10.19360/j.cnki.11-3303/g4.2020.04.010.
[2] 丁秀涛. 考试评价在教学诊断中的应用探索——以北京高考评价为例 [J]. 考试研究, 2023, 19 (5): 41-49.
[3] 张萍, 温恒福. 大学生学习质量四维管理模型的建构[J].教育科学,2015,31(6):41-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8064.2015.06.008.
[4] 王培培,栾家杰,韩军等. OSCE考试模式在临床药学本科实践技能考核中的应用 [J]. 济宁医学院学报, 2023, 46 (03): 225-228.
[5] 陈耀礼,唐万梅. 基于结构方程模型的高校学生在线考试满意度研究 [J]. 数字教育, 2019, 5 (02): 34-39.
[6] [美] L·W·安德森等编著,皮连生主译.学习、教学和评估的分类学--布鲁姆教育目标分类学修订版(简缩本)[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社.2007:58-76.
[7] 翟双庆. 论《黄帝内经》核心观念 [J]. 北京中医药大学学报, 2022, 45 (09): 913-918.
[8] 王济川,王小倩,姜宝法.结构方程模型:方法与应用[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2011:2-18.
[9] Hayes AF.Beyond Baron and Kenny : statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium[J].Commun Monogr,2009,76(4): 408-420.
[10] 张玲玲, 井坤娟, 郭欣然. 失能老年人长期照护需求影响因素问卷验证性因子分析[J].医学研究与教育,2021,38(5):59-68.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-490X.2021.05.009.
[11] 傅海燕, 于恒, 战佳阳, 等. 医古文课程思政教育与能力培养的探索与实践[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2023,25(2):1-4. DOI: 10.13194/j.issn.1673-842x.2023.02.001.
文章导航

/