护理教育

护理学专业本科生外科实习岗位胜任能力里程碑评价体系的构建与思考

  • 黄天雯 ,
  • 邓丽君 ,
  • 刘圆圆 ,
  • 张伟玲 ,
  • 黄晓敏 ,
  • 李娜
展开
  • 中山大学附属第一医院骨科-显微外科医学部,广东省骨科学重点实验室,广州 510080

收稿日期: 2023-08-30

  网络出版日期: 2024-05-30

基金资助

2022年度中山大学校级教学质量与教学改革工程项目(80000-12220011)

Construction and reflection on the competency milestone evaluation system for surgical internship positions for undergraduate nursing students

  • Huang Tianwen ,
  • Deng Lijun ,
  • Liu Yuanyuan ,
  • Zhang Weiling ,
  • Huang Xiaomin ,
  • Li Na
Expand
  • Department of Orthopaedics and Microsurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University &. Key Laboratory of Orthopaedics of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510080, China

Received date: 2023-08-30

  Online published: 2024-05-30

Supported by

2022 Sun Yat-sen University School-level Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project(80000-12220011)

摘要

目的 构建护理学专业本科生外科实习岗位胜任能力里程碑评价体系。方法 2022年5至10月,通过文献回顾拟定评价体系初稿,再采用德尔菲法进行2轮函询,通过专家积极系数、专家权威系数、专家意见协调程度和集中程度进行评价,其中专家积极系数用问卷回收率表示,专家权威系数(Cr)使用专家熟悉程度和判断依据的均值表示,专家意见协调程度和集中程度分别用肯德尔和谐系数(Kendall's W)和变异系数(CV)表示,最终确定评价体系。结果 遴选来自北京、上海、四川、湖北、广东的三级甲等综合性教学医院的18名专家进行函询。2轮专家函询的专家权威系数均为0.90,专家积极系数均为1.0,肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.194和0.474。最终构建的护理学专业本科生外科实习岗位胜任能力里程碑评价体系包括6项一级指标、28项二级指标。结论 本研究构建的护理学专业本科生外科实习岗位胜任能力里程碑评价体系具有权威性,评价体系具有良好的信度和效度,科学可靠,可操作性强,可以为全面客观评价护理学专业本科生外科实习的综合能力提供参考。

本文引用格式

黄天雯 , 邓丽君 , 刘圆圆 , 张伟玲 , 黄晓敏 , 李娜 . 护理学专业本科生外科实习岗位胜任能力里程碑评价体系的构建与思考[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024 , 44(6) : 421 -425 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230830-00183

Abstract

Objective To construct a milestone evaluation system for nursing undergraduates' competency in surgical internship positions. Methods From May to July 2022, the first draft of the evaluation system was formulated through literature review and expert meeting method; from August to October 2022, 2 rounds of correspondence inquiry were conducted by Delphi method, and the evaluation was conducted through the positive coefficient of experts, the authority coefficient of experts, the degree of coordination of experts' opinions and the degree of concentration, so as to finalize the evaluation system. Results A total of 18 experts were selected from Level 3A comprehensive teaching hospitals in Beijing, Shanghai, Sichuan, Hubei, and Guangdong to conduct the correspondence inquiry. the expert authority coefficient of the 2 rounds of expert correspondence inquiry was 0.90, the positive coefficient of the experts was 100%, and the Kendall's harmony coefficients were 0.194 and 0.474, respectively. the final evaluation system of the milestone of the competency of the undergraduates surgical internship positions in the nursing program included 6 primary indicators, 28 secondary indicators. Conclusions The evaluation system constructed in this study is authoritative, and the index system has good reliability and validity, is scientific, reliable and operable, and can provide a reference for comprehensive and Objective evaluation of the comprehensive competence of undergraduate nursing students' surgical internship.

参考文献

[1] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world[J]. Lancet, 2010,376(9756):1923-1958. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
[2] LeVan DJ, Plizga LA, Wiley A, et al. The Journey to ACGME Accreditation: aprogram's perspectives and practical guidance from the ACGME[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2016,8(3):473-477. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00773.1.
[3] ERIC S,HOLMBOE LE,HAMSTRA S. The milestones guidebook[EB/OL](2017-04-12)[2020-03-12].http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/MilestonesAnnualReport2016.pdf.
[4] Weiss KB, Bagian JP, Nasca TJ. The clinical learning environment: the foundation of graduate medical education[J]. JAMA, 2013,309(16):1687-1688. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.1931.
[5] Lau ST, Ang E, Samarasekera DD, et al. Development of undergraduate nursing entrustable professional activities to enhance clinical care and practice[J]. Nurse Educ Today, 2020,87:104347. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104347.
[6] 蒲永莉, 易航, 钟立, 等. 里程碑式教学法在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术培训中的应用[J].医学教育管理,2023,9(3):354-359. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2023.03.015.
[7] 刘珅,陈云丰,杨庆诚,等.美国骨科住院医师胜任力评价系统Milestones2.0的解读与思考[J].中国毕业后医学教育,2023,7(1):107-112.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-4293.2023.01.022
[8] 中国精英教学医院联盟. 中国精英教学医院联盟住院医师核心胜任力里程碑评价体系[J].协和医学杂志,2023,14(5):978-982. DOI: 10.12290/xhyxzz.2022-0543.
[9] 吴金梅, 王健, 陈放. 美国眼科学住院医师Milestones评价系统解读与思考[J].中国继续医学教育,2022,14(14):180-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-9308.2022.14.046.
[10] 胡明熙, 毕怀梅, 王涛, 等. 护理硕士专业学位研究生教育里程碑计划体系构建[J].护理研究,2021,35(8):1488-1491. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2021.08.033.
[11] Philbrick V. Johns Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: model and guidelines,2nd edition[J]. Aorn Journal,2013,97(1):157-158.DOI:10.1016/j.aorn.2012.10.004.
[12] 郭秀花.医学现场调查技术与统计分析[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:273-276.
[13] 孙振球.医学统计学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:510-514.
[14] 黄天雯, 杨云英, 钟盈, 等. 全日制本科护理实习生岗位胜任力评价指标的构建[J].现代临床护理,2019,18(12):59-64. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8283.2019.12.011.
[15] 中华人民共和国国家卫生健康委员会,国家中医药管理局.关于印发进一步改善护理服务行动计划(2023—2025年)的通知国卫医政发[2023]16号.[EB/OL].(2023-06-20)[2023-08-16].http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202306/1ba5e5b3291044cb8aa0a1bd2999c967.shtml.
[16] 刘华平, 王青, 刘桂英. 国内外护理安全教育发展现状与思考[J].中国护理管理,2018,18(10):1316-1320. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2018.10.005.
[17] 程婷, 涂惠, 李雪芹, 等. 护理本科生循证实践能力现状与障碍因素研究[J].循证护理,2023,9(4):716-721. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.2095-8668.2023.04.030.
[18] 杨奕婷, 朱雪娇. 护理本科生循证实践能力现状及教学对策[J].护理研究,2020,34(11):1944-1948. DOI: 10.12102/j.issn.1009-6493.2020.11.015.
文章导航

/