住院医师规范化培训

里程碑评价体系在皮肤科住院医师分阶段双向评价中的结果分析

  • 孙健 ,
  • 李琳娜 ,
  • 田雪 ,
  • 付玉萍 ,
  • 李珺 ,
  • 高航 ,
  • 周爱军
展开
  • 1锦州医科大学附属第一医院皮肤科,锦州 121001;
    2锦州医科大学附属第一医院住培管理处,锦州 121001;
    3锦州医科大学附属第一医院教务处,锦州 121001

收稿日期: 2023-07-11

  网络出版日期: 2024-03-29

基金资助

2022年辽宁省教育科学“十四五”规划课题一般课题(JG22DB276);锦州医科大学研究生教育教学研究与改革项目(YJ2022-010);锦州医科大学教育教学研究与改革项目(YB2021031)

Analysis of milestone evaluation system in phased bidirectional evaluation of dermatology resident physicians

  • Sun Jian ,
  • Li Linna ,
  • Tian Xue ,
  • Fu Yuping ,
  • Li Jun ,
  • Gao Hang ,
  • Zhou Aijun
Expand
  • 1Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, China;
    2Academic Affairs Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, China;
    3Resident Training Management Office, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, China

Received date: 2023-07-11

  Online published: 2024-03-29

Supported by

2022 Liaoning Province “14th Five-Year Plan” of Educational Science General Project(JG22DB276);Graduate Education Research and Reform Project of Jinzhou Medical University(YJ2022-010); Education Research and Reform Project of Jinzhou Medical University(YB2021031)

摘要

目的 研究里程碑(Milestones)评价体系在皮肤科住院医师阶段性双向评价中的结果分析。方法 选取2021年9月在锦州医科大学附属第一医院皮肤科进行住院医师规范化培训(简称住培)的150名住院医师和8名主治医师为研究对象,采用改良Milestones评价表进行住院医师自评和主治医师他评。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验和Mann-Whitney U检验比较不同年资住院医师评分差异,采用配对t检验比较自评与他评之间的差异以及不同来源住院医师评分的差异。结果 第一年住院医师Milestones评分为3~4分,第二年住院医师评分为4~5分,第三年住院医师评分为6~7分。第一年住院医师自评评分为(3.73±0.59)分,主治医师他评评分为(3.33±0.47)分;第二年住院医师自评评分为(4.66±0.62)分,主治医师他评评分为(4.44±0.51)分;第三年住院医师自评评分为(5.09±0.52)分,主治医师他评评分为(4.93±0.86)分,其差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。结论 不同年资和不同来源的皮肤科住培学员milestone评分具有区分度,建议主治医师实施因材施教,从而提升培训效果。

本文引用格式

孙健 , 李琳娜 , 田雪 , 付玉萍 , 李珺 , 高航 , 周爱军 . 里程碑评价体系在皮肤科住院医师分阶段双向评价中的结果分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2024 , 44(4) : 307 -310 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20230711-00676

Abstract

Objective Analysis of the results of milestone evaluation system in the phased two-way evaluation of dermatology residents. Methods A total of 150 physicians who received standardized resident training (referred to as residency training) and 8 attending physicians in the Department of Dermatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University in September 2021 were selected as the research objects. An improved Milestones evaluation form was carried out for self-assessment and attending physician-assessment. Kruskal Wallis H test and Mann Whitney U test were used to compare the differences in the scores of residents with different seniority. Paired t-test was used to compare the differences between self-assessment and other assessments and the differences in the scores of residents from different sources. Results First year resident trainees' milestones score was 3~4 points, second year resident trainees' score was 4~5 points, and third year resident trainees' score was 6~7points. First year resident trainees' self-assessment score was (3.73±0.59), while others-assessment score was (3.33±0.47), second year resident trainees' self-assessment score was(4.66±0.62), while others-assessment score was(4.44±0.51), third year resident trainees' self-assessment score was(5.09±0.52), while others-assessment score was(4.93±0.86), the differences were all statistically significant (all P<0.001). Conclusions The milestone score of dermatologists with different seniority can be distinguished. It is suggested that the attending physicians can teach them according to their aptitude, so as to improve the training effect.

参考文献

[1] Witteles RM, Verghese A. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education(ACGME) Milestones-Time for a Revolt?[J]. JAMA Intern Med, 2016,176(11):1599-1600. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5552.
[2] Turiansky GW, Loo D. The dermatology milestone project[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2014,6(1 Suppl 1):44-46. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-06-01s1-04.
[3] Motaparthi K, Edgar L, Aughenbaugh WD, et al. Milestones 2.0: An advancement in competency-based assessment for dermatology[J]. Clin Dermatol, 2022,40(6):776-781. DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2022.08.010.
[4] Andreas H, Meier, MD, MEd, et al.Using the ACGME milestones for resident self-evaluation and faculty engagement[J].J Surg Educ ,2016, 150(157):73-76. DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.09.00.
[5] Bowden SG, Tan H, Rothbaum MG, et al. Milestones for neurosurgery sub-interns: a novel evaluation tool to quantitatively differentiate residency applicants[J]. J Neurosurg, 2023,139(6):1748-1756. DOI: 10.3171/2023.3.JNS23259.
[6] Pangaro L. A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations[J]. Acad Med, 1999,74(11):1203-1207. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199911000-00012.
[7] Sheng WH, Ho YL, Jenq CC, et al. Longitudinal assessment of milestone development among internal medicine residents in Taiwan[J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2022,121(11):2281-2287. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.05.013.
[8] Ekpenyong A, Zetkulic M, Edgar L, et al. Reimagining Feedback for the Milestones Era[J]. J Grad Med Educ, 2021,13(2 Suppl):109-112. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-00840.1.
文章导航

/