目的 构建学生版中医经典课程质量评价指标体系,为相关课程质量评价提供支持。方法 基于背景—输入—过程—结果评价(context-input-process-product evaluation)模型(简称CIPP模型),采用文献研究法、文本分析法、半结构访谈法、德尔菲法构建评价指标体系,在此基础上采用优序图法计算指标权重,并计算克朗巴赫系数和结构效度KMO值对指标体系进行信效度检验。结果 遴选来自北京中医药大学中医经典类课程教研室和中医药高等教育领域共15位专家进行咨询,两轮咨询专家权威系数分别为0.957和0.955。构建的指标体系包含4个一级指标、11个二级指标和32个三级指标及其具体内容和各级指标的权重,指标体系克朗巴赫系数为0.966,结构效度KMO值为0.942。结论 基于CIPP模型构建的中医经典课程质量评价指标体系具有一定的科学性和权威性,信效度良好,能够作为中医经典课程质量的评价工具。
Objective To construct a quality evaluation index system of traditional Chinese medicine classic courses from the perspective of student evaluation so as to provide tool support for related course quality evaluation. Methods Based on the context-input-process-product (CIPP) evaluation model, using literature research, text analysis, semi-structured interviews, and Delphi method,the evaluation index system was constructed. The analytic hierarchy process was then used to calculate the weights of the indicators. Furthermore, Cronbach′s alpha coefficient and Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) value were calculated to examine the reliability and validity of the index system. Results A total of 15 experts from the teaching and research group of traditional Chinese medicine classics and higher education in traditional Chinese medicine at Beijing University of Chinese Medicine were selected to be consulted. The authority coefficients of the two rounds of consultation were 0.957 and 0.955, respectively. Finally, index system including 4 primary indicators, 11 secondary indicators, and 32 tertiary indicators, with specific content and indicator weights were constructed. The Cronbach′s alpha was 0.966, and the KMO value for structural validity was 0.942. Conclusions The quality evaluation index system of traditional Chinese medicine classic courses based on the CIPP evaluation model was scientific and authoritative, with good reliability and validity. It can serve as an evaluation tool for the quality of traditional Chinese medicine classic courses.
[1] 王乾, 谷晓红, 袁娜, 等. 基于CIPP模型的中医疫病学课程评价研究[J].中医教育,2021,40(6):61-66. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2021.06.354.
[2] 李晓曼, 翟双庆, 谷晓红, 等. 基于CIPP模型的手医学课程评价研究[J].中医教育,2022,41(3):31-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2022.03.542.
[3] 邢钰, 孙丹(指导). 学生视角下对中医经典课程设置的思考[J].世界最新医学信息文摘(电子版),2019(24):288.
[4] 刘铁钢, 白辰, 于河, 等. 中医经典课程学习现状调查分析[J].中医教育,2020,39(4):50-52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-305X.2020.04.412.
[5] 卢立涛. 测量、描述、判断与建构——四代教育评价理论述评[J].教育测量与评价(理论版),2009(3):4-7,17.
[6] 肖远军. CIPP教育评价模式探析[J].教育科学,2003,19(3):42-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-8064.2003.03.012.
[7] 徐国庆. 高职教育课程质量评价指标研究[J].中国高教研究,2013(2):89-93.
[8] 李波. 高校课程质量评价体系构建探析[J].课程·教材·教法,2009(11):93-96.
[9] 马玲玲. 基于CIPP模型构建综合实践活动课程评价指标体系[J].教学与管理(理论版),2020(3):115-118.
[10] 王颖颖. CIPP模式下的高职院校创业教育课程评价[J].南宁职业技术学院学报,2017,22(3):62-64.
[11] 李煜凯. 大学课程质量评价指标体系设计及实证分析[D]. 大连:大连理工大学,2017.
[12] 许祥云, 王佳佳. 高校课程思政综合评价指标体系构建——基于CIPP评价模式的理论框架[J].高校教育管理,2022,16(1):47-60. DOI: 10.13316/j.cnki.jhem.20211224.005.
[13] 侯建军. 基于CIPP评价模式的高职课程评价机制建设[J].中国职业技术教育,2015(11):92-96.
[14] 吴显宁, 苏丹. 基于CIPP模型的本科院校"外科学"课程评价体系构建与应用[J].中国医学教育技术,2021,35(3):291-295,321. DOI: 10.13566/j.cnki.cmet.cn61-1317/g4.202103004.
[15] 陈向明. 质的研究方法与社会科学研究[M]. 北京:教育科学出版社,2000:165-165.
[16] 田振华,熊华夏.建构,解构与重构:校长视角下农村小学全科教师的未来走向——基于NVivo11.0访谈资料的编码分析[J]. 当代教育科学,2020(4):75-79. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2221.2020.04.016.
[17] 王少娜, 董瑞(综述), 谢晖, 等. 德尔菲法及其构建指标体系的应用进展[J].蚌埠医学院学报,2016,41(5):695-698. DOI: 10.13898/j.cnki.issn.1000-2200.2016.05.048.
[18] 屈京楼, 朱亚鑫, 曲波. 德尔菲法在医学教育研究中的应用[J].中华医学教育杂志,2019,39(3):227-230. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2019.03.017.
[19] 王辉, 连斌, 陶冶栋, 等. 基于德尔菲法及优序图法建立医院科研绩效考核指标体系[J].中国卫生质量管理,2022,29(6):97-101. DOI: 10.13912/j.cnki.chqm.2022.29.06.25.
[20] 李慧珍, 宗星煜, 王晶亚, 等. 基于改良德尔菲法与优序图法的中医药团体标准评价指标体系构建[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2023,29(5):775-780.
[21] 李灿,辛玲. 调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J]. 中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-3674.2008.05.034.
