目的 聚焦医学教育研究特征和前沿,为我国未来的医学教育改革提供参考。方法 基于Web of Science(WOS)数据库,以医学教育为主题,采用CiteSpace和HistCite对纳入文献进行共被引聚类分析和特征分析。借鉴基本科学指标数据库分析方法,统计医学教育研究领域机构排名,并采用组合加权计数模式统计卓越贡献作者。结果 2022年度医学教育研究前沿聚焦于新型冠状(新冠)病毒感染疫情影响下医学教学模式改革、置信专业活动、教育技术与解剖学教学改革、尊重文化多样性、学生心理健康状态、适应性专长和医师职业身份形成等7个主题。2013至2022年,医学教育研究中,排名前1‰的20家机构和112名卓越贡献作者中,分别有19家(95.0%)和105人(93.8%)来自欧美国家。结论 新冠病毒感染疫情成为这一年来医学教育变革的重要影响因素,置信专业活动和岗位胜任力成为医学教育研究的重要议题。近十年医学教育研究高影响力机构和卓越贡献作者集中于欧美国家。
Objective Focusing on the characteristics and fronts of medical education research, aimed at providing references for future medical education reform. Methods Based on the Web of Science database, with medical education as the theme, CiteSpace and HistCite softwares were used for co-citation cluster analysis and characteristic analysis of the included literature. Reference to the statistical analysis method of Essential Science Indicators, the ranking of institutions in the field of medical education research was analyzed, and the combined weighted counting scheme was used to rank the authors with outstanding contributions. Results In 2022, medical education research fronts focuses on seven themes, including the reform of medical teaching model under the influence of COVID-19, entrustable professional activities, educational technology and the anatomy teaching reform, respect for cultural diversity, mental health state, adaptive expertise and professional identity formation. Among the top 1‰ 20 institutions and 112 authors with outstanding contributing, 19 (95%) and 105 (93.8%) are located in the Occident from 2013 to 2022. Conclusions This report reveals that the COVID-19 pandemic has become an important factor in the transformation of medical education in the past year, entrustable professional activities and competency have become important topics in the evaluation and teaching of medical education, and high-impact institutions and authors with outstanding contributing mainly distributed in the Occident in recent ten years.
[1] 吴红斌, 杜鹃, 程化琴, 等. 国际医学教育研究发展及启示 ——基于WOS百余年文献的计量分析[J].复旦教育论坛,2019,17(5):97-103. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0059.2019.05.017.
[2] 闻德亮, 李鸿鹤. 2022国际医学教育研究前沿报告[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2022:1-87.
[3] 闻德亮. 2018国际医学教育研究前沿报告[M]. 北京:科学出版社, 2018:1-40.
[4] 中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院, 中国科学院文献情报中心, 科睿唯安. 中科院发布《2022研究前沿》报告,我国52个研究前沿世界领先[EB/OL](2022-12-28)[2023-03-31]. http://www.bjb.cas.cn/kjcx/kcsd/202212/t20221228_6591544.html.
[5] Clarivate. Essential Science Indicators[EB/OL].[2023-03-31]. https://esi.help.clarivate.com/Content/esi-thresholds.htm.
[6] Vavryĉuk V. Fair ranking of researchers and research teams[J]. PLoS One, 2018,13(4):e0195509. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195509.
[7] Enoch LC, Abraham RM, Singaram VS. A comparative analysis of the impact of online, blended, and face-to-face learning on medical students′ clinical competency in the affective, cognitive, and psychomotor domains[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022,22(1):753. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03777-x.
[8] Hennus MP, van Dam M, Gauthier S, et al. The logic behind entrustable professional activity frameworks: A scoping review of the literature[J]. Med Educ, 2022,56(9):881-891. DOI: 10.1111/medu.14806.
[9] Basavanna PN, Ravishankar MV, Arora D. Anatomy lives in the dissection hall: post-Covid-19 perception of students[J]. Anat Sci Educ, 2022,15(1):83-85. DOI: 10.1002/ase.2156.
[10] Teshome BG, Desai MM, Gross CP, et al. Marginalized identities, mistreatment, discrimination, and burnout among US medical students: cross sectional survey and retrospective cohort study[J]. BMJ, 2022,376:e065984. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-065984.
[11] Wang Q, Zhang B, Zhang S, et al. Anxiety and depression and their interdependent influencing factors among medical students in Inner Mongolia: the cross-sectional survey[J]. BMC Med Educ, 2022,22(1):787. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03839-0.
[12] Gamborg ML, Jensen RD, Musaeus P, et al. Balancing closure and discovery: adaptive expertise in the workplace[J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2022,27(5):1317-1330. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10177-9.
[13] Cornett M, Palermo C, Ash S. Professional identity research in the health professions-a scoping review[J]. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 2023,28(2):589-642. DOI: 10.1007/s10459-022-10171-1.
[14] Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19[J]. JAMA, 2020,323(21):2131-2132. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.5227.
[15] ten Cate O. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training[J]. Med Educ, 2005,39(12):1176-1177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02341.x.
[16] Cupido N, Fowler N, Sonnenberg LK, et al. Adaptive expertise in CanMEDS 2025[J]. Can Med Educ J, 2023,14(1):18-21. DOI: 10.36834/cmej.75445.
[17] Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y. Teaching medical professionalism: supporting the development of a professional identity[M]. New York, Cambridge University Press. 2016:6.
