继续医学教育

两种医护团队临床急救综合能力模拟培训方法的对比研究

  • 陈军 ,
  • 乔松 ,
  • 徐芬 ,
  • 杨杰 ,
  • 陈芳
展开
  • 浙江医院医学模拟中心, 杭州 310030

收稿日期: 2022-07-20

  网络出版日期: 2023-05-31

基金资助

全国医学教育发展中心医学模拟教育研究课题(2021MNZC33)

Comparative study of two kinds of simulation training methods on efficiency of comprehensive clinical emergency response capabilities of medical teams

  • Chen Jun ,
  • Qiao Song ,
  • Xu Fen ,
  • Yang Jie ,
  • Chen Fang
Expand
  • Medical Simulation Center of Zhejiang Hospital, Hangzhou 310030, China
Chen Jun, Email: 1632050729@qq.com

Received date: 2022-07-20

  Online published: 2023-05-31

Supported by

National Center for Health Professions Education Development Funding Project for Simulated Medical Education Research (2021MNZC33)

摘要

目的 对比原位模拟与常规模拟培训方法在医护团队临床急救综合能力培训中的应用效果。方法 采用试验对照研究方法,选取2021年1至12月在浙江医院参与临床急救综合能力培训的学员240人,采用随机数字表法分成由1名医生加3名护士组成的临床急救团队60个,同时分为原位模拟组与常规模拟组,每组30个团队,分别给予原位模拟培训与常规模拟培训,培训后对2组进行团队临床急救综合能力测试,测试成绩组间比较采用t检验或秩和检验。结果 原位模拟组团队临床急救综合能力测试总得分高于常规模拟组[(93.9±1.9)分比(82.85±4.79)分],原位模拟组的技术性能力得分和非技术性能力得分也均高于常规模拟组[(68.1±1.3)分比(64.1±3.0)分,(25.8±1.6)分比(18.8±3.4)分],差异均具有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论 原位模拟培训在提高医护团队临床急救综合能力、技术性能力和非技术性能力方面优于常规模拟培训,临床技能模拟培训可以考虑采用原位模拟培训方法。

本文引用格式

陈军 , 乔松 , 徐芬 , 杨杰 , 陈芳 . 两种医护团队临床急救综合能力模拟培训方法的对比研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2023 , 43(6) : 463 -466 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20220720-00918

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficiency of in situ simulation and conventional simulation training methods on enhancing the comprehensive clinical emergency response capabilities of medical teams. Methods Controlled experiment design was used. Two hundred and forty trainees who participated in comprehensive clinical emergency response training from January to December 2021 were randomly assigned into 60 clinical emergency teams through random number table method, with each consisting of one doctor and three nurses. The teams were then randomly assigned into the in situ simulation group and conventional simulation group equally through random number table method. In situ simulation training and conventional simulation training were provided separately. After training, comprehensive clinical emergency response capability tests were given and scores were compared by t-tests or rank sum tests between groups. Results The total test scores of the comprehensive clinical emergency response capabilities were significantly higher in the in situ simulation group than in the conventional simulation one [(93.9±1.9) vs. (82.85±4.79), P<0.05] with better technical [(68.1±1.3) vs. (64.1±3.0), P<0.05] and non-technical [ (25.8±1.6) vs. (18.8±3.4), P<0.05 ] performance scores. Conclusions In situ simulation training had brought better performance both on technical and non-technical performance capabilities of medical teams in clinical emergency response than conventional simulation training. Thus, in situ simulation training could be considered as an better approach for clinical skill simulation training.

参考文献

[1] Thomas M. Training and assessing non-technical skills: a practical guide[M] . CRC Press:Boca Raton,2018:30.
[2] Schaumberg A, Schrder T, Sander M. Emergency medical training through simulation : always the same for everyone?[J] . Anaesthesist, 2017,66(3):189-194. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-017-0264-x.
[3] Martin A, Cross S, Attoe C. The use of in situ simulation in healthcare education: current perspectives[J] . Adv Med Educ Pract, 2020,11:893-903. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S188258.
[4] Goldshtein D, Krensky C, Doshi S, et al. In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review[J] . BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn, 2020,6(1):3-9. DOI: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000387.
[5] Lee C, Mowry JL, Maycock SE, et al. The impact of hospital-based in situ simulation on nurses′ recognition and intervention of patient deterioration[J] . J Nurses Prof Dev, 2019,35(1):18-24. DOI: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000507.
[6] 姚瑶, 黎尚荣, 袁联雄. 原位模拟和引导性反馈在住院医师规范化培训小讲课督导培训中的应用[J] .中华医学教育杂志,2021,41(12):1081-1085. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210406-00455.
[7] 尹悦, 韩霏, 郭凤林, 等. 医学模拟教学课程体系的效果评价[J] .天津医科大学学报,2013,19(2):156-157,167. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8147.2013.02.022.
[8] 代恒茂, 周志强, 夏历, 等. 原位模拟培训提高麻醉专科护士苏醒期呼吸抑制应急处理能力[J] .护理学杂志,2021,36(12):11-14. DOI: 10.3870/j.issn.1001-4152.2021.12.011.
[9] Auerbach M, Roney L, Aysseh A, et al. In situ pediatric trauma simulation: assessing the impact and feasibility of an interdisciplinary pediatric in situ trauma care quality improvement simulation program[J] . Pediatr Emerg Care, 2014,30(12):884-891. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000297.
[10] Srensen JL, stergaard D, LeBlanc V, et al. Design of simulation-based medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation[J] . BMC Med Educ, 2017,17(1):20. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3.
[11] Srensen JL, Navne LE, Martin HM, et al. Clarifying the learning experiences of healthcare professionals with in situ and off-site simulation-based medical education: a qualitative study[J] . BMJ Open, 2015,5(10):e008345. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008345.
[12] Kjaergaard-Andersen G, Ibsgaard P, Paltved C, et al. An in situ simulation program: a quantitative and qualitative prospective study identifying latent safety threats and examining participant experiences[J] . Int J Qual Health Care, 2021,33(1)DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa148.
[13] 周玲, 杨歆璐, 汪姗, 等. 原位模拟在5分钟即刻剖腹产麻醉学规范化培训教学中的应用[J] .安徽医专学报,2021,20(5):88-90. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2097-0196.2021.05.033.
[14] Wheeler DS, Geis G, Mack EH, et al. High-reliability emergency response teams in the hospital: improving quality and safety using in situ simulation training[J] . BMJ Qual Saf, 2013,22(6):507-514. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000931.
文章导航

/