目的 了解黑龙江省某医科大学本科生的国际视野水平,为改进医学人才培养工作提供参考。方法 采用问卷调查方法。2020年11月,以黑龙江省某医科大学在校本科学生为研究对象,采用医学生国际视野自评问卷对其进行调查,通过Mann-Whitney U秩和检验进行数据分析。结果 共1 383名医学生参与调查,医学生的国际视野评分为[3.03(0.68)]分。男性在国际视野知识[3.13(1.00)分比3.00(0.63)分]、国际视野能力[3.00(0.94)分比3.00(0.52)分]和国际视野素质[3.25(1.00)分比3.00(0.88)分]3个维度的评分均高于女性(均P<0.001);有科创经历的医学生在国际视野知识[3.00(1.00)分比3.00(0.63)分,P=0.001]、国际视野能力[3.00(0.83)分比3.00(0.58)分,P=0.002]、国际视野素质[3.13(1.00)分比3.00(0.88)分,P=0.009]3个维度的评分均高于无科创经历者。来自城镇地区的医学生在国际视野知识[3.00(1.00)分比3.00(0.63)分]、国际视野能力[3.00(0.71)分比3.00(0.57)分]、国际视野素质[3.13(1.00)分比3.00(0.81)分]3个维度的评分均高于来自农村的医学生(均P<0.001)。结论 医学本科生的国际视野评分处于中等水平,不同性别、生源和有无科创经历的医学生,其国际视野水平不同,可重点关注女性、无科创经历、来自农村的医学生,有针对性地提高其国际视野知识、国际视野能力和国际视野素质。

Objective To understand the international perspective level of undergraduates in a medical university in Heilongjiang Province, and provide a reference for further improving medical talents training. Methods Questionnaire survey was used. In November, 2020, the undergraduate students from a medical college in Heilongjiang Province were taken as the research object and an international perspective self-assessment questionnaire for medical students was used. The data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U rank sum test. Results A total of 1 383 medical undergraduates were covered in this survey, and the international perspective score of the students was 3.03 (0.68). The scores of male students were higher in the three dimensions: knowledge of international perspective [3.13 (1.00) vs. 3.00 (0.63)], ability of international perspective [3.00 (0.94) vs. 3.00 (0.52)] and quality of international perspective [3.25 (1.00) vs. 3.00 (0.88)] than those of female students (all P<0.001); Medical students with scientific innovation experience have higher scores in three dimensions: international perspective knowledge [3.00 (1.00) vs.3.00 (0.63), P =0.001], international perspective ability [3.00 (0.83) vs. 3.00 (0.58), P =0.002], international perspective quality [3.13 (1.00) vs.3.00 (0.88), P=0.009] than those without scientific innovation experience. Medical students from urban areas have scores higher than those from rural areas in three dimensions: international perspective knowledge [3.00 (1.00) vs.3.00 (0.63)], international perspective ability [3.00 (0.71) vs.3.00 (0.57)] and international perspective quality [3.13 (1.00) vs.3.00 (0.81)] (all P<0.001). Conclusions The international perspective score of medical undergraduates is at a medium level. Gender and experience of scientific and technological innovation experience have significant effect on the capacity building of international perspective. It is suggested to pay more attention to female students and students without scientific and technological innovation experience and from rural areas, so as to extend their knowledge of international perspective, improve their capacity and quality of international perspective.