目的 探讨某医学院校硕士研究生临床流行病学的教学效果及其影响因素,为教学模式的改革和创新提供参考。方法 选取某医学院校2020级409名硕士研究生为研究对象,以问卷调查的方式了解其临床流行病学授课前后的学习情况,使用logistic回归模型分析考试成绩的影响因素。结果 2020级硕士研究生临床流行病学成绩为(93.2±4.8)分。统招硕士研究生成绩为(94.0±4.9)分,在职硕士研究生成绩为(90.2±5.1)分。成绩优秀(90分以上)与年龄[OR(95%CI)=0.81(0.70~0.95)]、统招生[OR(95%CI)=4.52(2.16~9.43)]、基于案例学习的授课方式[OR(95% CI)=1.23(1.05~1.44)]、学习前希望提高统计分析能力[OR(95% CI)=7.26(1.72~33.74)]、学习过该课程[OR(95% CI)=4.96(2.07~11.87)]、进行课后复习[OR(95%CI)=2.87(1.47~5.60)]、教学内容掌握程度[OR(95% CI)=5.60(1.34~23.44)]等有关。结论 硕士研究生临床流行病学考试成绩优秀。除年龄和培养方式外,基于案例学习的授课方式、课前准备和课后预习也是影响学生考试成绩的主要因素。建议教师根据学生需求调整授课方式,并督促其养成预习复习的习惯,以巩固和提升教学效果。
刘少华
,
宋扬
,
贾王平
,
王盛书
,
陈仕敏
,
李雪航
,
王建华
,
刘淼
,
何耀
. 某医学院校硕士研究生临床流行病学教学效果及其影响因素研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022
, 42(4)
: 376
-379
.
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210914-01159
Objective To explore the teaching effects and influencing factors of clinical epidemiology courses for graduates and provide reference for the reformation and innovation of teaching mode. Methods A total of 409 graduates enrolled in 2020 were selected to investigate the learning situation before and after teaching by questionnaire survey. Using logistic regression model to analyze the influencing factors. Results The score of overall students was (93.2±4.8). The scores of full-time students and part-time students were(94.0±4.9) and (90.2±5.1), respectively.Excellent grades(above 90) were associated with age [OR(95% CI)=0.81(0.70~0.95)], unified enrollment [OR(95% CI)=4.52(2.16~9.43)], case-based learning (CBL) [OR(95% CI)=1.23(1.05~1.44)], desire to improve statistical analysis skills before study [OR(95% CI)=7.26(1.72~33.74)], having studied the course [OR(95% CI)=4.96(2.07~11.87)], conducting post-course review [OR(95% CI)=2.87(1.47~5.60)], and mastery of the instructional content [OR(95% CI)=5.60(1.34~23.44)]. Conclusions Excellent results in the postgraduate clinical epidemiology exam.In addition to age and unified enrollment, CBL, preparation before class and review after class are also the main factors affecting the results. It is suggested that the lecture style should be adjusted according to students' needs and supervise students to develop the habit of preparation and review in order to consolidate and improve the teaching effect.
[1] 王家良,王滨有.临床流行病学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:2-8.
[2] Brownson RC, Samet JM, Chavez GF, et al. Charting a future for epidemiologic training[J].Ann Epidemiol,2015,25(6):458-465.DOI:10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.03.002.
[3] 杨姗姗,何耀,刘淼,等.对医学硕士研究生临床流行病学认知及教学成绩的影响因素调查[J].解放军医学院学报,2015,36(1):86-89.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2015.01.027.
[4] 陶宁,张园月,徐蕾,等.临床医学专业流行病学教学现状调查[J].继续医学教育,2019,33(4):14-16.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-6763.2019.04.008
[5] 李海玲,苏雄,隋静,等.我校研究生临床流行病学教学效果评价与探索[J].中国中医药现代远程教育,2020,18(5):81-83.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2779.2020.05.103.
[6] 付长金,王萍玉.医学硕士研究生临床流行病学认知及教学需求调查[J].医学教育研究与实践,2018,26(2):250-254.DOI:10.13555/j.cnki.c.m.e.2018.02.020.