中华医学教育杂志

中华医学教育杂志 >

2022 , Vol. 42 >Issue 1: 85 - 88

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210618-00767

国外医学与比较医学教育

阿尔伯塔大学教师临床诊断推理教学培训的特点与启示

  • 左天明 ,
  • 郑斌 ,
  • 丁宁
展开
  • 1中国医科大学国际医学教育研究院教育技术研究所,沈阳 110122;
    2阿尔伯塔大学医学与口腔学院外科仿真实验室,埃德蒙顿 T6G 2V2

收稿日期: 2021-06-18

  网络出版日期: 2021-12-31

基金资助

中国医科大学“十三五”第二批医学教育科学研究课题(YDJK2018007)

收起

Characterization and revelation on clinical diagnostic reasoning workshop in University of Alberta

  • Zuo Tianming ,
  • Zheng Bin ,
  • Ding Ning
Expand
  • 1Research Institute for Educational Technology, Institute for International Health Professions Education and Research, China Medical University, Shenyang 110011, China;
    2Surgical Simulation Research Lab, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton T6G 2V2, Canada

Received date: 2021-06-18

  Online published: 2021-12-31

Supported by

The Second Batch of Medical Education Scientific Research Projects in the “The 13th 5-year Plan” from China Medical University (YDJK2018007)

Fold

摘要

临床推理能力是临床医生岗位胜任力的核心能力之一,始终是各国医学教育学者研究关注的热点。加拿大顶尖院校之一阿尔伯塔大学教师临床诊断推理教学培训有着独到之处。本文围绕其教师临床诊断推理教学培训的3个主题——基础理论、培养临床诊断推理能力的有效提问技巧及教学评价工具进行介绍。希望能够对我国临床诊断推理教学和师资培训有所借鉴。

关键词： 临床诊断推理; 教师发展; 教育理论; 教学与评价

本文引用格式

左天明 , 郑斌 , 丁宁 . 阿尔伯塔大学教师临床诊断推理教学培训的特点与启示[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2022 , 42(1) : 85 -88 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210618-00767

Abstract

Clinical reasoning is one of the core competencies for all clinicians. It has been a central topic of medical education and studied by many health institutes around the world. The University of Alberta is one of the leading institutes in teaching clinical diagnosis reasoning. This article introduces three themes of training for clinical diagnosis reasoning using in the University of Alberta. The three themes include the fundamental theories, effective questioning techniques to foster clinical diagnosis reasoning, and tools that are available for assessing clinical diagnosis reasoning. The experience from University of Alberta may help medical educators in China to build an effective faculty development program and strengthen the training of clinical diagnosis reasoning for medical students in China.

Key words： Clinical diagnosis reasoning; Faculty development; Education theory; Teaching and assessment

参考文献

[1] Audétat MC, Laurin S, Sanche G, et al. Clinical reasoning difficulties: a taxonomy for clinical teachers[J]. Med Teach, 2013,35(3):e984-e989. DOI:10.3109/0142159X.2012.733041.
[2]Restrepo D, Armstrong KA, Metlay JP. Annals clinical decision making: avoiding cognitive errors in clinical decision making[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2020,172(11):747-751. DOI:10.7326/M19-3692.
[3]曹倩. 信息化辅助教学在住院医师临床思维培养中的现状及展望[J].全科医学临床与教育,2020,18(9):769-770,776. DOI:10.13558/j.cnki.issn1672-3686.2020.009.001.
[4]Eva KW. What every teacher needs to know about clinical reasoning[J]. Med Educ, 2005,39(1):98-106. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01972.x.
[5]Croskerry P. A universal model of diagnostic reasoning[J]. Acad Med, 2009,84(8):1022-1028. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181ace703.
[6]Fleming A, Cutrer W, Reimschisel T, et al. You too can teach clinical reasoning![J]. Pediatrics, 2012,130(5):795-797. DOI:10.1542/peds.2012-2410.
[7]Lambe KA, O'Reilly G, Kelly BD, et al. Dual-process cognitive interventions to enhance diagnostic reasoning: a systematic review[J]. BMJ Qual Saf, 2016,25(10):808-820. DOI:10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004417.
[8]Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006,355(21):2217-2225. DOI:10.1056/NEJMra054782.
[9]Kost A, Chen FM. Socrates was not a pimp: changing the paradigm of questioning in medical education[J]. Acad Med, 2015,90(1):20-24. DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000446.
[10]Trowbridge RL. Twelve tips for teaching avoidance of diagnostic errors[J]. Med Teach, 2008,30(5):496-500. DOI:10.1080/01421590801965137.
[11]Neher JO, Stevens NG. The one-minute preceptor: shaping the teaching conversation[J]. Fam Med,2003,35(6):391-393.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉