师资队伍建设

原位模拟和引导性反馈在住院医师规范化培训小讲课督导培训中的应用

  • 姚瑶 ,
  • 黎尚荣 ,
  • 袁联雄
展开
  • 1中山大学附属第三医院继续教育科,广州 510630;
    2中山大学附属第三医院临床技能培训中心,广州 510630;
    3中山大学附属第三医院科研科,广州 510630

收稿日期: 2021-04-06

  网络出版日期: 2021-11-29

基金资助

2019年度中山大学附属第三医院管理科研基金面上项目(2019GLMS07)

The application of in situ simulated and instructive feedback teaching in the supervision of lecture expert training in residential education

  • Yao Yao ,
  • Li Shangrong ,
  • Yuan Lianxiong
Expand
  • 1Department of Continuing Education, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630,China;
    2Clinical Skills Training Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China;
    3Department of Scientific Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630,China

Received date: 2021-04-06

  Online published: 2021-11-29

Supported by

General Project of Management Scientific Research Fund of The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University in 2019(2019GLMS07)

摘要

目的 评价原位模拟和引导性反馈在住院医师规范化培训(以下简称住培)小讲课督导培训中的应用效果。方法 2020年6月至8月,选取18名督导学员,以理论授课、第一轮实践培训、第二轮实践培训、线下练习、第三轮实践培训的流程,综合运用理论授课、原位模拟和引导性反馈的教学方法进行培训。比较每轮培训后督导学员与培训教师对小讲课评分的差异。结果 第一轮~第三轮督导学员与培训教师的总评分差值分别为12.00(5.50,17.00)、4.00(2.00,8.00)、6.00(2.75,11.25),第二轮与第一轮评分差值的差异具有统计学意义(Z=2.49,P=0.01),第二轮与第三轮评分差值的差异无统计学意义(Z=0.78,P=0.44)。结论 综合运用原位模拟与引导性反馈方法能迅速降低督导学员与培训教师对小讲课评分的差异,有助于提高督导学员评分的准确性。

本文引用格式

姚瑶 , 黎尚荣 , 袁联雄 . 原位模拟和引导性反馈在住院医师规范化培训小讲课督导培训中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021 , 41(12) : 1081 -1085 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210406-00455

Abstract

Objective To evaluate in situ simulation and instructive feedback teaching method in the training of supervisor of teaching process for residential training. Methods From June to August 2020, 18 trainees were selected for lecture supervisor training for in situ simulation, instructive feedback and lecturing. The training process included theoretical teaching, two rounds of skill training (demonstration-rating-feedback), offline practice and the third round of practical training (demonstration-rating-feedback). Results The median and quartile of score difference of the three rounds was 12.00(5.50, 17.00) (the first round), 4.00(2.00, 8.00) (the second round) and 6.00(2.75, 11.25) (the third round). Through Wilcoxon Matched-Pairs Signed-Ranks Test to compare with the score difference of the first round, the score difference of the second round (Z=2.49,P=0.01), there is no significant difference between the second and the third round (Z=0.78,P=0.44). Conclusions The method of in situ simulation integrated with instructive feedback effectively minimizes the difference of evaluation results (scores) from supervision experts and that from training consultant, so as to improve the consistency and accuracy of the evaluation results from the lecture supervisors.

参考文献

[1] 黎尚荣, 姚瑶, 吴少林. 推进住院医师规范化培训临床实践课程规范,提高培训质量[J].广东医学,2021,42(5):497-498. DOI: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20210950.
[2] 高山艳. 新时代教育督导队伍专业化:诉求、问题与对策[J].当代教育科学,2018(11):74-79.
[3] 徐爱萍. 高校教学督导制度的路径选择[J].高教发展与评估,2015,31(1):17-22,98.
[4] 胡志玲.高校教学督导专业化建设效果评价的实证研究——以XX高校为例[D].南昌:南昌大学,2014.
[5] Patterson MD, Blike GT, Nadkarni VM. In situ simulation: challenges and results[EB/OL].[2021-03-06]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK43682/?report=classic.
[6] Martin A, Cross S, Attoe C. Theuse of in situ simulation in healthcare education: current perspectives[J]. Adv Med Educ Pract, 2020(11):893-903. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S188258.
[7] 李萍, 刘嘉祯, 陆耀红, 等. 实时反馈教学在医师资格考试实践技能考官培训中的应用研究[J].中华医学教育探索杂志,2017,16(12):1293-1296. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-1485.2017.12.024.
[8] 肖树芹, 王艳玲, 冯新玮. 结构化引导性反馈在高仿真情景模拟护理教学中的应用[J].中华现代护理杂志,2020,26(9):1247-1250. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115682-20191008-03604.
[9] 广东省医师协会毕业后医学教育工作委员会. 广东省住院医师规范化培训临床小讲课实施指引[J].广东医学,2021,42(5):508-510. DOI: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx.20210949.
[10] 仲旦彦, 陈玉荣.基于学习金字塔理论的翻转课堂教学改革探析[J].高教学刊, 2016(18): 151,154.
文章导航

/