国外医学与比较医学教育

同济大学医学院与内布拉斯加大学医学中心人文社会科学课程比较研究

  • 杨宇虹 ,
  • 孙小婷 ,
  • 井然 ,
  • 魏春岚 ,
  • 杨文卓 ,
  • 郑加麟
展开
  • 1同济大学附属第十人民医院转化医学中心, 上海 200072;
    2美国内布拉斯加大学医学中心,奥马哈 68131;
    3同济大学医学院临床教学培训与考试中心,上海 200092;
    4同济大学医学院,上海 200092

收稿日期: 2021-04-15

  网络出版日期: 2021-09-28

Humanities and social science curriculum at UNMC and Tongji University School of Medicine

  • Yang Yuhong ,
  • Sun Xiaoting ,
  • Jing Ran ,
  • Wei Chunlan ,
  • Yang Wenzhuo ,
  • Zheng Jialin
Expand
  • 1Translational Medicine Center, Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai 200072, China;
    2University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68131, USA ;
    3Clinical Education Training and Exam Center, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China;
    4Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China

Received date: 2021-04-15

  Online published: 2021-09-28

摘要

本文从学生和教育研究者的视角,在课程设置、教学对象、课程形式、教学方法、课程内容、几个方面,分析了同济大学医学院与美国内布拉斯加大学医学中心系统整合课程改革前后人文社会科学课程的情况,发现两校在课程的形式和卫生系统科学课程的内容方面各有特点。通过总结可以得到以下几点启发:人文社会科学课程的设计应当以深入践行胜任力为主导理念,同时应加强多学科合作、加强教学意识和教学梯队建设,发挥附属医院在人文社会科学课程教学中的作用,从而建立适合我国复杂医疗环境的医学人文社会科学教育体系。

本文引用格式

杨宇虹 , 孙小婷 , 井然 , 魏春岚 , 杨文卓 , 郑加麟 . 同济大学医学院与内布拉斯加大学医学中心人文社会科学课程比较研究[J]. 中华医学教育杂志, 2021 , 41(10) : 956 -960 . DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115259-20210415-00497

Abstract

This article describes characteristics of the humanities and social science curriculum at University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) and Tongji University school of medicine from the perspectives of students and medical education researchers. The background, design, format, teaching content, target population of students are compared and implications are discussed. The major differences are curriculum format and teaching content regarding health system science. Based on the comparison, following motions are proposed to optimize the curriculums of humanities and social science at Tongji University. Multidisciplinary collaboration is needed to design competency-based curriculum, while the learning objectives should address the specific issue of patient-physician relationship in China. Faculty development program and teaching assistants program are potential solutions to the shortage of small group facilitators. Furthermore, projects to improve health-care environment in affiliated teaching hospitals should be encouraged to build a better working and learning culture.

参考文献

[1] 吴红斌, 王维民. 世界医学教育改革与发展回顾及我国八年制医学教育的思考[J].中华医学教育杂志,2018,38(5):641-645. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-677X.2018.05.001.
[2] Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world[J]. Lancet, 2010,376(9756):1923-1958. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
[3] 印发《“健康中国2030”规划纲要》[N]. 人民日报,2016-10-26(001).
[4] Liu Z, Tian L, Chang Q, et al. A competency model for clinical physicians in China: a cross-sectional survey[J]. PLoS One, 2016,11(12):e0166252. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166252.
[5] Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality[J]. Soc Sci Med, 2014,103:126-133. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032.
[6] 王瑾晖, 徐协群, 花苏榕, 等. 医学生助教进行腹腔镜技能培训的教学效果评价[J].基础医学与临床,2019,39(6):912-915. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6325.2019.06.029.
[7] Vaughn LM, Baker RC. Psychological size and distance: emphasising the interpersonal relationship as a pathway to optimal teaching and learning conditions[J]. Med Educ, 2004,38(10):1053-1060. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01952.x.
文章导航

/